Magneto-impedance tomography of elastically deformed amorphous Co-based ribbons

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

The distribution of magnetic permeability over the cross section of rapidly quenched amorphous Co68.6Fe3.9Mo3.0Si12.0B12.5 ribbons was studied in the range of elastic tensile stresses from 0 to 480 MPa. This distribution was restored using magnetic impedance tomography, which is a method based on the analysis of the frequency dependences of the impedance, when external magnetic fields of varying amplitude or tensile mechanical stresses are applied to ribbons. In this case, the alternating-current frequency varied in the range from 0.01 to 80 MHz.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

D. Bukreev

Irkutsk State University

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: da.bukreev@gmail.com
Ресей, Irkutsk, 664003

M. Derevyanko

Irkutsk State University

Email: da.bukreev@gmail.com
Ресей, Irkutsk, 664003

G. Kurlyandskaya

Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin

Email: da.bukreev@gmail.com
Ресей, Ekaterinburg, 620002

A. Semirov

Irkutsk State University

Email: da.bukreev@gmail.com
Ресей, Irkutsk, 664003

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Pan P., Hayward T.J. Comparative study of the giant stress impedance behavior of commercial amorphous ribbons for strain sensing applications // J. Appl. Phys. 2022. V. 131. P. 214503.
  2. Li D., Lu Z., Zhou S. Giant stress-impedance effect in amorphous and thermally annealed Fe73.5Cu1Nb3Si13.5B9 ribbons // Sens Actuators A Phys. 2003. V. 109. P. 68–71.
  3. Bukreev D.A., Derevyanko M.S., Moiseev A.A., Semirov A.V., Savin P.A., Kurlyandskaya G.V. Magnetoimpedance and Stress-Impedance Effects in Amorphous CoFeSiB Ribbons at Elevated Temperatures // Materials. 2020. V. 13. P. 3216.
  4. Gazda P., Nowicki M., Szewczyk R. Comparison of Stress-Impedance Effect in Amorphous Ribbons with Positive and Negative Magnetostriction // Materials. 2019. V. 12. P. 275.
  5. Beato-López J.J., Urdániz-Villanueva J.G., Pérez-Landazábal J.I., Gómez-Polo C. Giant Stress Impedance Magnetoelastic Sensors Employing Soft Magnetic Amorphous Ribbons // Materials. 2020. V. 13. P. 2175.
  6. Лукшина В.А., Дмитриева Н.В., Волкова Е.Г., Шишкин Д.А. Магнитные свойства сплава Fe63.5Ni10Cu1Nb3Si13.5B9, нанокристализованного в присутствии растягивающих напряжений // ФММ. 2019. Т. 120. С. 346–351.
  7. Li D., Lu Z., Zhou S. Induced Magnetic Anisotropy and Stress-Impedance Effect in Nanocrystalline Fe73.5Cu1Nb3Si13.5B9 Ribbons // IEEE Sensors Journal. 2006. V. 6. P. 924–927.
  8. Beach R.S., Berkowitz A.E. Sensitive field‐ and frequency‐dependent impedance spectra of amorphous FeCoSiB wire and ribbon (invited) // J. Appl. Phys. 1994. V. 76. P. 6209–6213.
  9. Bengus V.Z., Duhaj P., Korolkova E.B., Ocelík V. Internal Stress Contribution to the Yield Stress Anisotropy of Amorphous Alloy Ribbons // Solid State Phenomena. 1993. V. 35–36. P. 575–580.
  10. Tejedor M., Garcı́a J.A., Carrizo J., Elbaile L., Santos J.D. Effect of residual stresses and surface roughness on coercive force in amorphous alloys // J. Appl. Phys. 2002. V. 91. P. 8435.
  11. Takahashi M., Miyazaki T. Magnetic Anisotropy in an Amorphous Fe80P13C7 Alloy // Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1979. V. 18. P. 743–752.
  12. Tsukahara S., Satoh T., Tsushima T. Magnetic anisotropy distribution near the surface of amorphous ribbons // IEEE Trans Magn. 1978. V. 14. P. 1022–1024.
  13. Kraus L., Tomáš I., Keatociivílová E., Speingmann B., Müller K. Magnetic anisotropy caused by oriented surface roughness of amorphous ribbons // Phys. Status Solidi (a). 1987. V. 100 V. 289–299.
  14. Vavassori P., Callegaro L., Puppin E., Malizia F., Ronconi F. Surface magnetic characterization of FeB amorphous ribbons // JMMM. 1996. V. 157–158. P. 171–172.
  15. Bukreev D.A., Derevyanko M.S., Moiseev A.A., Svalov A.V., Semirov A.V. The Study of the Distribution of Electrical and Magnetic Properties over the Conductor Cross-Section Using Magnetoimpedance Tomography: Modeling and Experiment // Sensors. 2022. V. 22. P. 9512.
  16. Bukreev D.A., Derevyanko M.S., Semirov A.V. Magnetoimpedance Effect in Cobalt-Based Amorphous Ribbons with an Inhomogeneous Magnetic Structure // Sensors. 2023. V. 23. P. 8283.
  17. Букреев Д.А., Деревянко М.С., Моисеев А.А., Семиров А.В. Магнитоимпедансная томография аморфных проводов CoFeTaSiB // ФММ. 2023. Т. 124. С. 710–716.
  18. Buznikov N.A., Kurlyandskaya G.V. Theoretical Study of Microwires with an Inhomogeneous Magnetic Structure Using Magnetoimpedance Tomography // Sensors. 2024. V. 24. P. 3669.
  19. Amirabadizadeh A., Lotfollahi Z., Zelati A. Giant magnetoimpedance effect of Co68.15Fe4.35Si12.5B15 amorphous wire in the presence of magnetite ferrofluid // JMMM. 2016. V. 415. P. 102–105.
  20. Knobel M., Gómez-Polo C., Vázquez M. Evaluation of the linear magnetostriction in amorphous wires using the giant magneto-impedance effect // JMMM. 1996. V. 160. P. 243–244.
  21. Alekhina I., Kolesnikova V., Rodionov V., Andreev N., Panina L., Rodionova V., Perov N. An indirect method of micromagnetic structure estimation in microwires // Nanomaterials. 2021. V. 11. P. 11–16.

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу
2. Fig. 1. Division of the computer model of the tape into layers with different magnetic permeabilities.

Жүктеу (15KB)
Метадеректер
3. Fig. 2. Frequency dependences of the reduced impedance Z(f)/RDC, obtained experimentally (lines) and reconstructed using MIT (markers), for different values ​​of tensile mechanical stresses.

Жүктеу (16KB)
Метадеректер
4. Fig. 3. Scanning electron microscopy image of the free (a) and contact (b) surfaces of the rapidly quenched Co68.6Fe3.9Mo3.0Si12.0B12.5 tape, and the magnetic hysteresis loop when an external field is applied in the plane of the tape along its length (c).

Жүктеу (28KB)
Метадеректер
5. Fig. 4. Dependences of MI on the external magnetic field strength ΔZ/Z(H), obtained at different tensile stresses at an alternating current frequency: (a) 1 MHz; (b) 80 MHz.

Жүктеу (42KB)
Метадеректер
6. Fig. 5. Frequency dependencies: (a) peak field Hp (field in which MI reaches its maximum value); (b) maximum MI (ΔZ/Z)max. The dependencies were obtained at mechanical tensile stresses σ from 0 to 480 MPa.

Жүктеу (35KB)
Метадеректер
7. Fig. 6. Relative change in impedance under mechanical stress. The dependences at different frequencies of alternating current were obtained experimentally (solid lines) and also calculated based on the results of the MIT (markers).

Жүктеу (20KB)
Метадеректер
8. Fig. 7. Dependences of magnetic permeability of different areas of the tape on tensile mechanical stresses, obtained using MIT.

Жүктеу (17KB)
Метадеректер