Beyond skin deep: unraveling breast neurofibromatosis (a case report)
- Authors: Balbino M.1, Montatore M.1, Masino F.1, Carpagnano F.2, Guglielmi G.1,2,3
-
Affiliations:
- Foggia University School of Medicine
- Dimiccoli Hospital
- IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza Hospital
- Issue: Vol 7, No 1 (2026)
- Pages: 99-106
- Section: Case reports
- Submitted: 17.09.2025
- Accepted: 20.01.2026
- Published: 07.04.2026
- URL: https://jdigitaldiagnostics.com/DD/article/view/690521
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/DD690521
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BRVMFB
- ID: 690521
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Neurofibromatosis type 1 is an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by the development of benign and, occasionally, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Although cutaneous manifestations are well described, breast involvement is rare and may mimic other benign or malignant breast lesions, posing a significant diagnostic challenge.
We report the case of a 55-year-old woman with a known history of neurofibromatosis type 1 who presented with a progressively enlarging, palpable mass in her left breast. Ultrasound imaging demonstrated a well-circumscribed, heterogeneous hypoechoic lesion, whereas mammography revealed a poorly defined mass within dense breast parenchyma. Histopathological examination following surgical excision confirmed the diagnosis of a neurofibroma composed of spindle-shaped Schwann cells with diffuse S-100 protein positivity and no evidence of cytological atypia.
Surgical excision was performed for symptom relief and cosmetic reasons, resulting in complete resolution of symptoms and a satisfactory aesthetic outcome. This case highlights the importance of considering neurofibromatosis during the differential diagnosis of breast masses, particularly in patients with verified neurofibromatosis type 1. Increased awareness of this rare manifestation allows timely diagnosis, appropriate surgical planning, and adequate genetic counseling.
Updated recommendations for breast surveillance—such as annual contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging between the ages of 30 and 50 according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2025 guidelines—and new therapeutic options, including MEK inhibitors for symptomatic neurofibromas, should be considered in the comprehensive management of neurofibromatosis type 1 patients.
Full Text
BACKGROUND
Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), also known as von Recklinghausen disease, is a multisystem genetic disorder with an estimated prevalence of approximately 1 in 3000 individuals worldwide [1–3]. It is characterized by café-au-lait macules, axillary freckling, Lisch nodules, and the development of multiple cutaneous and subcutaneous neurofibromas [1, 2]. Although neurofibromas typically arise from peripheral nerves, their occurrence within the breast parenchyma is uncommon [3].
Breast involvement in NF1 remains under-recognized and represents a diagnostic challenge due to overlapping imaging features with more common benign lesions, such as fibroadenomas and hamartomas, as well as malignant entities, including phyllodes tumors and breast carcinoma [4–6]. Although most breast lesions in NF1 patients are benign, the potential—albeit low—for malignant transformation necessitates a structured diagnostic approach integrating clinical assessment, multimodal imaging, and histopathological confirmation [2, 5, 7].
This case report describes the clinical presentation, imaging findings, diagnostic pathway, and management of a breast neurofibroma in a 55-year-old woman with NF1, with particular emphasis on radiological assessment and contemporary management strategies [8, 9].
CASE DESCRIPTION
Patient Information
A 55-year-old woman with a known history of NF1, diagnosed during childhood based on café-au-lait macules and multiple cutaneous neurofibromas (see Fig. 1), presented with a palpable mass in her left breast. The lesion had been self-detected approximately six months before and gradually increased in size, becoming intermittently uncomfortable.
Fig. 1. Skin of the abdomen of the patient with many cutaneous neurofibromas.
Anamnesis
The patient denied prior breast trauma, nipple discharge, or skin changes. She reported regular menstrual cycles and had no personal or family history of breast cancer.
On physical examination, a palpable, mobile nodule was identified in the upper outer quadrant of the left breast. The overlying skin and nipple-areolar complex appeared normal, without retraction or inflammatory changes.
Systemic Manifestations of Neurofibromatosis Type 1
In addition to multiple cutaneous neurofibromas and café-au-lait macules, no other systemic manifestations of NF1 were identified. Specifically, the patient had no evidence of central nervous system tumors, skeletal deformities, or visceral or ophthalmologic involvement beyond the cutaneous findings.
Diagnostic Assessment
Mammography
Mammography of the left breast revealed a poorly defined, round mass appearing laterally on the craniocaudal view and superiorly on the mediolateral-oblique projection, consistent with localization in the upper outer quadrant. The lesion was partially obscured by heterogeneously dense breast parenchyma (American College of Radiology density category C). No suspicious microcalcifications, architectural distortion, or skin thickening were observed (see Fig. 2).
Fig. 2. Mammography of the left breast in craniocaudal and mediolateral-oblique projections showing heterogeneously dense breast parenchyma (American College of Radiology density category C).
Based on the mammographic appearance and clinical context, the lesion was classified as BI-RADS 3 (probably benign).
Breast Ultrasound
Targeted breast ultrasound revealed an oval, well-circumscribed, heterogeneous hypoechoic mass corresponding to the palpable abnormality in the left breast. The lesion measured approximately 4 cm in maximum diameter and demonstrated parallel orientation, smooth margins, and no posterior acoustic shadowing or enhancement.
Color Doppler imaging showed minimal internal vascularity, without evidence of neovascularization. No associated ductal abnormalities or axillary lymphadenopathy were detected (see Fig. 3).
Fig. 3. Targeted breast ultrasound of the left breast showing an oval, well-circumscribed, heterogeneous hypoechoic mass with parallel orientation and smooth margins.
Based on sonographic findings, the lesion was also classified as BI-RADS 3 (probably benign).
Considering the patient’s history of NF1 and the imaging characteristics, neurofibroma was considered the leading diagnostic hypothesis, although histological verification was recommended [10, 11].
Percutaneous Biopsy
Given the progressive growth of the lesion and the underlying diagnosis of NF1, an ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy was performed before surgical intervention to exclude malignancy. Histopathological examination revealed a benign spindle-cell proliferation consistent with neurofibroma, without cytological atypia or increased mitotic activity. Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated diffuse positivity for S-100 protein, confirming the diagnosis of a benign peripheral nerve sheath tumor.
Differential Diagnosis
The differential diagnosis of breast masses in patients with NF1 includes:
- Fibroadenoma: common benign tumors, typically occurring in younger women [12, 13].
- Phyllodes tumor: rare fibroepithelial neoplasms that may demonstrate rapid growth and variable malignant potential [13].
- Hamartoma: benign mixed-tissue lesions with variable imaging appearance [12].
- Neurofibroma: benign peripheral nerve sheath tumors, particularly relevant in NF1 patients [1, 7, 13].
- Breast carcinoma: uncommon in NF1 but must always be excluded, given the reported increased risk in this population [6, 13, 14].
- Other benign lesions: including fat necrosis, adenosis, and cysts [12].
Intervention and Histopathological Findings
Following multidisciplinary discussion, the patient underwent surgical excision of the breast mass under general anesthesia. Lesion localization was guided by palpation and imaging findings. A well-defined mass was excised from the left breast parenchyma with clear surgical margins.
Microscopic examination confirmed the diagnosis of a breast neurofibroma, characterized by spindle-cell proliferation with wavy nuclei. Immunohistochemical staining for S-100 protein was positive, and no features of atypia or malignant transformation were identified.
Surgical Indication
Despite benign histology, surgical excision was recommended due to progressive lesion growth, patient-reported discomfort, potential cosmetic distortion, and the known—although low—risk of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor development in NF1 patients. After shared decision-making, the patient elected to proceed with surgical treatment.
Follow-Up and Outcomes
Postoperative recovery was uneventful. The patient reported complete resolution of discomfort and improvement in breast symmetry. Clinical follow-up examinations were scheduled at regular intervals to monitor for recurrence or the development of new lesions.
Given the increased risk of breast cancer in women with NF1, the patient was enrolled in a structured imaging surveillance program, including annual breast ultrasound and mammography, with consideration of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in accordance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) 2025 guidelines.
At one-year follow-up, the patient remained asymptomatic, and no recurrent or new breast lesions were identified on clinical examination or imaging studies. The patient was satisfied with the cosmetic outcome. Genetic counseling was recommended to address hereditary risk, long-term surveillance, and familial transmission of NF1.
DISCUSSION
NF1 is caused by pathogenic variants in the NF1 gene located on chromosome 17q11.2, encoding the tumor suppressor protein neurofibromin [15, 16]. Loss of neurofibromin function leads to dysregulation of the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK signaling pathway, resulting in abnormal Schwann cell proliferation and neurofibroma development [15].
Although cutaneous neurofibromas are common, breast involvement is rare and may closely resemble other benign or malignant breast lesions on imaging [1, 12, 13]. In this case, mammography and ultrasound findings suggested a benign etiology but were not pathognomonic. Contrast-enhanced MRI could have provided additional tissue characterization and enhancement kinetics, potentially improving lesion characterization [9].
Women with NF1 have an increased lifetime risk of breast cancer, particularly before the age of 50 [6, 14], underscoring the importance of early and structured screening. Current NCCN 2025 guidelines recommend annual contrast-enhanced MRI between the ages of 30 and 50, with mammography introduced according to age and breast density [5].
Surgical excision remains the treatment of choice for symptomatic or enlarging breast neurofibromas [1, 13]. For patients with unresectable or plexiform neurofibromas, targeted therapy with MEK inhibitors has shown promising results, although data on breast-localized lesions are still limited [17].
CONCLUSION
Breast neurofibroma is a rare manifestation of NF1 that should be considered in the differential diagnosis of breast masses in NF1 patients. Accurate diagnosis relies on careful clinical assessment, multimodal imaging, and histopathological verification.
Adherence to contemporary surveillance guidelines and a multidisciplinary approach are essential for optimal management. Increased awareness of this uncommon presentation may facilitate timely diagnosis, appropriate intervention, and improved long-term outcomes for patients with NF1.
ДОПОЛНИТЕЛЬНАЯ ИНФОРМАЦИЯ
Вклад авторов. M. Balbino — проведение работы, работа с данными, написание черновика рукописи; M. Manuela — работа с данными, визуализация; M. Federica — проведение работы, пересмотр и редактирование текста рукописи; F.A. Carpagnano — руководство работой, пересмотр и редактирование текста рукописи; G. Guglielmi — определение концепции, руководство работой, пересмотр и редактирование текста рукописи. Все авторы одобрили рукопись (версию для публикации), а также согласились нести ответственность за все аспекты настоящей работы, гарантируя надлежащее рассмотрение и решение вопросов, связанных с точностью и добросовестностью любой её части.
Этическая экспертиза. Неприменимо.
Согласие на публикацию. Авторы получили письменное информированное добровольное согласие пациентки на публикацию персональных данных, в том числе фотографий, в научном журнале, включая его электронную версию.
Источники финансирования. Отсутствуют.
Раскрытие интересов. Авторы заявляют об отсутствии отношений, деятельности и интересов за последние три года, связанных с третьими лицами (коммерческими и некоммерческими организациями), интересы которых могут быть затронуты содержанием статьи.
Оригинальность. При проведении исследования и создании настоящей статьи авторы не использовали ранее полученные и опубликованные сведения (данные, текст, иллюстрации).
Доступ к данным. Редакционная политика в отношении совместного использования данных к настоящей работе не применима.
Генеративный искусственный интеллект. ChatGPT (GPT-4, OpenAI, https://openai.com), большую языковую модель, разработанную в США, использовали исключительно для языкового редактирования текста. Авторы самостоятельно проверили, отредактировали и утвердили окончательную версию рукописи и несут полную ответственность за её содержание. Инструменты искусственного интеллекта не использовали для подготовки текста, анализа данных, создания изображений или оформления списка литературы.
Рассмотрение и рецензирование. Настоящая работа подана в журнал в инициативном порядке и рассмотрена по обычной процедуре. В рецензировании участвовали внешний рецензент и член редакционной коллегии.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Author contributions: M. Balbino: investigation, data curation, writing—original draft; M. Manuela: data curation, visualization; M. Federica: investigation, writing—review & editing; F.A. Carpagnano: supervision, writing—review & editing; G. Guglielmi: conceptualization, supervision, writing—review & editing. All the authors approved the version of the manuscript to be published and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work, ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Ethics approval: Not applicable.
Consent for publication: Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of personal data in a scientific journal and its online version.
Funding sources: No funding.
Disclosure of interests: The authors have no relationships, activities, or interests for the last three years related to for-profit or not-for-profit third parties whose interests may be affected by the content of the article.
Statement of originality: We hereby confirm that no previously published material (including text, images, or data) has been used in this article.
Data availability statement: The editorial policy regarding data sharing does not apply to this work.
Generative AI: ChatGPT (GPT-4, OpenAI, https://openai.com), a large language model developed in the United States, was used solely to assist with language editing. The authors reviewed, revised, and approved all content and take full responsibility for the final version of the manuscript. No AI tools were used for drafting content, data analysis, images, or references.
Provenance and peer review: This article was submitted unsolicited and reviewed following the standard procedure. The peer-review process involved one external reviewer and a member of the Editorial Board.
About the authors
Marina Balbino
Foggia University School of Medicine
Email: marinabalbino93@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0009-2808-5708
MD
Italy, FoggiaManuela Montatore
Foggia University School of Medicine
Email: manuela.montatore@unifg.it
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-1526-5047
MD
Italy, FoggiaFederica Masino
Foggia University School of Medicine
Email: federicamasino@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0004-4289-3289
MD
Italy, FoggiaFrancesca A. Carpagnano
Dimiccoli Hospital
Email: c.francesca1991@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7681-2898
MD
Italy, BarlettaGiuseppe Guglielmi
Foggia University School of Medicine; Dimiccoli Hospital; IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza Hospital
Author for correspondence.
Email: giuseppe.guglielmi@unifg.it
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4325-8330
MD, Professor
Italy, Foggia; Barletta; FoggiaReferences
- Rotili A, De Maria F, Di Venosa B, et al. Solitary breast neurofibroma: imaging aspects. Ecancermedicalscience. 2018;12:800. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2018.800
- Nasri S, Benmoussa Y, Abbou W, et al. Imaging appearance of isolated diffuse neurofibroma of the nipple–areolar area: a case report. Pan Afr Med J. 2021; 39:178. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2021.39.178.30438 EDN: UMUULU
- Woo SH, Jung HK, Kim W. Bilateral breast cancer in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 1: a case report. J Korean Soc Radiol. 2021;82(2):417–422. doi: 10.3348/jksr.2020.0092 EDN: PQPTBQ
- Kouli A, Alayoubi A, Alali M, et al. Breast carcinoma in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 1 and a huge plexiform neurofibroma of the contralateral breast: a case report. BMC Womens Health. 2025;25(1):360. doi: 10.1186/s12905-025-03908-8 EDN: GDDAYY
- Kini U, Walsh MF, Title R. Increased breast cancer risk in women with neurofibromatosis type 1: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2019;17(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13053-019-0120-x EDN: IDNNVI
- Sharif S, Moran A, Huson SM, et al. Women with neurofibromatosis 1 are at a moderately increased risk of breast cancer and should be considered for early screening. J Med Genet. 2007;44(8):481–484.
- Aidara CM, Diop D, Ndiaye OK, et al. Apport de l’imagerie dans la neurofibromatose de type 1. Feuil Radiol. 2015;55(1):31–36. doi: 10.1016/j.frad.2014.09.004
- Da Silva AV, Rodrigues FR, Pureza M, et al. Breast cancer and neurofibromatosis type 1: a diagnostic challenge in patients with a high number of neurofibromas. BMC Cancer. 2015;15(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1215-z
- Gokalp G, Hakyemez B, Kizilkaya E, Haholu A. Myxoid neurofibromas of the breast: mammographic, sonographic, and MRI appearances. Br J Radiol. 2007;80(958):e234–237. doi: 10.1259/bjr/33539044
- Ahlawat S, Fayad LM, Khan MS, et al. Whole-body MRI applications in the neurofibromatoses: NF1, NF2, and schwannomatosis. Neurology. 2016;87(7 Suppl. 1):S31–S39. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002929
- Plunkett C, Pilkington M. Beliefs, screening attitudes and breast cancer awareness of young women with neurofibromatosis type 1: a reflexive thematic analysis. Health Psychol Behav Med. 2025;30(3):369–383. doi: 10.1177/13591053241255053
- Evans DG, Bowers N, Burkitt-Wright E, et al. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors in neurofibromatosis 1. J Med Genet. 2012;39(5):311–314. doi: 10.1136/jmg.39.5.311
- Walker L, Thompson D, Easton D, Ponder M, Frayling I, Baralle D. A prospective study of neurofibromatosis type 1 cancer incidence in the UK. Br J Cancer. 2006;95(2):233–238. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603227 EDN: RNCTIC
- Friedman JM, Birch PH. Type 1 neurofibromatosis: a descriptive analysis of the disorder in 1,728 patients. Am J Med Genet. 1997;70(2):138–143. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19970516)70:2<138::aid-ajmg7>3.0.co;2-u
- Salemis NS, Nakos G, Sambaziotis D, Gourgiotis S. Breast cancer associated with type 1 neurofibromatosis: a case report. Breast Cancer. 2010; 17:306–309. doi: 10.1007/s12282-009-0119-7 EDN: MTYHWW
- Korf BR. Neurofibromatosis. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;111:333–340. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-52891-9.00039-7
- Hasson DM, Khera SY, Meade TL, Dupont EL, Greenberg HM, Diaz NM, et al. Challenges in breast conservation therapy in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 1: a case report. Breast J. 2008;14(2):188–192. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2007.00552.x
Supplementary files










