<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Digital Diagnostics</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Digital Diagnostics</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Digital Diagnostics</trans-title></trans-title-group><trans-title-group xml:lang="zh"><trans-title>Digital Diagnostics</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2712-8490</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2712-8962</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Eco-Vector</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">633391</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17816/DD633391</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">QXLAWR</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Original Study Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Оригинальные исследования</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="zh"><subject>原创性科研成果</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging and <sup>18</sup>F-prostate-specific membrane antigen-1007 positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography for detecting bone metastases in prostate cancer</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Сравнительная оценка диагностической точности диффузионно-взвешенных изображений всего тела и позитронно-эмиссионной томографии с <sup>18</sup>F-простатоспецифичным мембранным антигеном-1007, совмещённой с компьютерной томографией, в выявлении костных метастазов при раке предстательной железы</trans-title></trans-title-group><trans-title-group xml:lang="zh"><trans-title>弥散加权全身成像与<sup>18</sup>F-前列腺特异性膜抗原-1007正电子发射计算机断层显像联合计算机断层扫描在前列腺癌骨转移检测中的诊断准确性比较评估</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1072-2202</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">4841-3234</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Gelezhe</surname><given-names>Pavel B.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Гележе</surname><given-names>Павел Борисович</given-names></name><name xml:lang="zh"><surname>Gelezhe</surname><given-names>Pavel B.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>канд. мед. наук</p></bio><bio xml:lang="zh"><p>MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)</p></bio><email>gelezhe.pavel@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9661-0254</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">8592-0558</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Reshetnikov</surname><given-names>Roman V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Решетников</surname><given-names>Роман Владимирович</given-names></name><name xml:lang="zh"><surname>Reshetnikov</surname><given-names>Roman V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Cand. Sci. (Physics and Mathematics)</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>канд. физ.-мат. наук</p></bio><bio xml:lang="zh"><p>Cand. Sci. (Physics and Mathematics)</p></bio><email>ReshetnikovRV1@zdrav.mos.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2681-9378</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">3306-1387</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Blokhin</surname><given-names>Ivan A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Блохин</surname><given-names>Иван Андреевич</given-names></name><name xml:lang="zh"><surname>Blokhin</surname><given-names>Ivan A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><email>BlokhinIA@zdrav.mos.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0166-3768</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">5789-0319</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kodenko</surname><given-names>Maria R.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Коденко</surname><given-names>Мария Романовна</given-names></name><name xml:lang="zh"><surname>Kodenko</surname><given-names>Maria R.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Cand. Sci. (Engineering)</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>канд. техн. наук</p></bio><bio xml:lang="zh"><p>Cand. Sci. (Engineering)</p></bio><email>KodenkoM@zdrav.mos.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Research and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Научно-практический клинический центр диагностики и телемедицинских технологий</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="zh">Research and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">European Medical Center</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Европейский медицинский центр</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="zh">European Medical Center</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="preprint" iso-8601-date="2025-06-05" publication-format="electronic"><day>05</day><month>06</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2025-07-08" publication-format="electronic"><day>08</day><month>07</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>6</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>239</fpage><lpage>250</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2024-06-10"><day>10</day><month>06</month><year>2024</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2024-12-06"><day>06</day><month>12</month><year>2024</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2025, Eco-Vector</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2025, Эко-вектор</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="zh">Copyright ©; 2025, Eco-Vector</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Eco-Vector</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Эко-вектор</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="zh">Eco-Vector</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://jdigitaldiagnostics.com/DD/article/view/633391">https://jdigitaldiagnostics.com/DD/article/view/633391</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p><bold><italic>BACKGROUND: </italic></bold>The increasing availability of <sup>18</sup>F-prostate-specific membrane antigen-1007 (<sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007) for prostate cancer staging highlighted its advantages, particularly its higher spatial resolution compared to analogs. Moreover, accumulating scientific data indicate an increase in false-positive findings, predominantly in bones, which may lead to unwarranted upstaging of the disease. Diffusion-weighted imaging may be used for the early detection of bone metastases.</p> <p><bold><italic>AIM: </italic></bold>This study aimed to assess and compare the diagnostic accuracy of whole-body <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007 positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography and whole-body and pelvic bone diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with prostate cancer.</p> <p><bold><italic>METHODS: </italic></bold>A retrospective single-center selective study was conducted. The imaging results of 119 patients with prostate cancer were divided into two groups: group 1 comprised 40 pairs of <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007 positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography and whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scans, and group 2 included 79 pairs of similar studies, with magnetic resonance imaging performed only for the pelvic bones. The diagnostic studies were performed at an inter-study interval ≤14 days. The metastatic bone lesions detected in different anatomical regions was counted using data from <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007 positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Lesions were considered true positives if confirmed by additional magnetic resonance imaging pulse sequences and/or follow-up observation.</p> <p><bold><italic>RESULTS: </italic></bold>Whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging demonstrated higher specificity (58.1%) for detecting bone metastases than <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007 positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (51.06%). However, its sensitivity was lower: 93.22% versus 97.55%.</p> <p><bold><italic>CONCLUSION: </italic></bold>Despite its advantages, <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007 positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography shows a high rate of false-positive bone findings. These are most commonly noted in the ribs, vertebrae, and pelvic bones. Suspicious bone lesions should be further evaluated to avoid unjustified disease upstaging. Thus, whole-body magnetic resonance imaging with diffusion-weighted sequences and selective fat signal suppression can be used.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p><bold>Обоснование. </bold>Повышение доступности <sup>18</sup>F-простатоспецифичного мембранного антигена-1007 (<sup>18</sup>F-ПСМА-1007) для стадирования рака предстательной железы демонстрирует его преимущества, из которых важным является более высокое пространственное разрешение, чем у аналогов. Одновременно накапливаются научные данные, свидетельствующие о значительном увеличении числа ложноположительных находок, преимущественно в костях, что может приводить к необоснованному завышению стадии онкологического процесса. Диффузионно-взвешенные изображения возможно использовать для ранней диагностики метастатического поражения костей.</p> <p><bold>Цель исследования. </bold>Оценка диагностической точности позитронно-эмиссионной томографии всего тела с <sup>18</sup>F-ПСМА-1007, совмещённой с компьютерной томографией (ПЭТ/КТ), в сравнении с диффузионно-взвешенными изображениями всего тела и костей малого таза у пациентов с раком предстательной железы.</p> <p><bold>Методы. </bold>Проведено ретроспективное одноцентровое выборочное исследование. Результаты исследований 119 пациентов с раком предстательной железы, разделены на две группы: 1-я группа — 40 пар данных ПЭТ/КТ с <sup>18</sup>F-ПСМА-1007 и магнитно-резонансной томографии с диффузионно-взвешенными изображениями всего тела; 2-я группа — 79 пар аналогичных исследований, при этом магнитно-резонансную томографию проводили только в области костей таза. Диагностические исследования выполнены при соблюдении временного интервала между ними не более 14 дней. Осуществляли подсчёт количества выявленных метастатических очагов костей в различных анатомических областях по данным ПЭТ/КТ с <sup>18</sup>F-ПСМА-1007 и магнитно-резонансной томографии. Истинно положительными считают очаги, подтверждённые с помощью дополнительных импульсных последовательностей магнитно-резонансной томографии и/или в результате динамического наблюдения.</p> <p><bold>Результаты. </bold>Диффузионно-взвешенная визуализация всего тела продемонстрировала более высокую специфичность в выявлении костных метастазов (58,1%) по сравнению с ПЭТ/КТ с <sup>18</sup>F-ПСМА-1007 (51,06%). Однако чувствительность оказалась ниже — 93,22 против 97,55% соответственно.</p> <p><bold>Заключение. </bold>Несмотря на известные преимущества, ПЭТ/КТ с <sup>18</sup>F-ПСМА-1007 демонстрирует высокую частоту ложноположительных находок в костях. Наиболее частая их локализация — рёбра, позвонки, кости таза. Для избежания неоправданного завышения стадии рекомендуется проведение уточняющей диагностики подозрительных очагов костей. В качестве такого метода можно использовать магнитно-резонансную томографию всего тела с диффузионно-взвешенными изображениями и селективным подавлением сигнала от жировой ткани.</p></trans-abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="zh"><p>论证。随着18F-前列腺特异性膜抗原-1007（<sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007）在前列腺癌分期中的应用日益普及，其更高的空间分辨率逐渐显现出相对于其他同类示踪剂的优势。与此同时，越来越多研究指出，该示踪剂主要在骨组织中导致大量假阳性发现，从而可能引起肿瘤分期的不合理升高。弥散加权成像可作为骨转移早期诊断的一种方法。</p> <p>目的：评估18F-PSMA-1007全身正电子发射计算机断层显像联合计算机断层扫描（PET/CT）在前列腺癌患者中，与全身及骨盆区域弥散加权成像相比，在骨转移检出方面的诊断准确性。</p> <p>方法。本研究为一项回顾性、单中心抽样研究。共纳入119例前列腺癌患者的检查结果，并将其分为两组：第1组为40对<sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT与全身弥散加权成像磁共振检查数据；第2组为79对类似检查数据，其中磁共振检查仅限于骨盆区域。所有诊断性检查均在时间间隔不超过14天的前提下完成。根据18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT和磁共振成像的结果，统计不同解剖部位检测到的骨转移灶数量。以磁共振成像的额外脉冲序列和/或动态随访结果作为依据，确认的病灶被视为真阳性。</p> <p>结果。全身弥散加权成像在骨转移检出方面的特异性为58.1%，高于18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT的51.06%。但敏感性略低，分别为93.22%和97.55%。</p> <p>结论。尽管<sup>18</sup>F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT具有已知优势，但在骨骼中显示出较高的假阳性检出率。其最常见的累及部位为肋骨、椎骨和骨盆骨。为避免肿瘤分期被不当地提高，建议对可疑骨骼病灶进行进一步评估。可采用全身磁共振成像，结合弥散加权成像和选择性脂肪信号抑制序列，作为此类补充诊断方法。</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>prostate-specific membrane antigen</kwd><kwd>positron emission tomography</kwd><kwd>magnetic resonance imaging</kwd><kwd>diffusion-weighted imaging</kwd><kwd>prostate cancer</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>простатоспецифичный мембранный антиген</kwd><kwd>позитронно-эмиссионная томография</kwd><kwd>магнитно-резонансная томография</kwd><kwd>диффузионно-взвешенные изображения</kwd><kwd>рак предстательной железы</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="zh"><kwd>前列腺特异性膜抗原</kwd><kwd>正电子发射计算机断层显像</kwd><kwd>磁共振成像</kwd><kwd>弥散加权成像</kwd><kwd>前列腺癌</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><award-group><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution xml:lang="en">Moscow City Health Department</institution></institution-wrap><institution-wrap><institution xml:lang="ru">Департамент здравоохранения города Москвы</institution></institution-wrap><institution-wrap><institution xml:lang="zh">Moscow City Health Department</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>1196</award-id></award-group></funding-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Petersen LJ, Zacho HD. PSMA PET for primary lymph node staging of intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer: an expedited systematic review. Cancer Imaging. 2020;20(1):1–8. doi: 10.1186/s40644-020-0290-9 EDN: EWACNH</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Wondergem M, van der Zant FM, Broos WAM, Knol RJJ. Clinical impact of PSMA PET in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer; a review of the literature. Tijdschrift voor Urologie. 2020;10(6-7):109–121. doi: 10.1007/s13629-020-00296-6 EDN: XRLHSC</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Hofman MS, Lawrentschuk N, Francis RJ, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multicentre study. The Lancet. 2020;395(10231):1208–1216. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30314-7 EDN: IDQIFB</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Treglia G, Annunziata S, Pizzuto DA, et al. Detection rate of 18F-Labeled PSMA PET/CT in biochemical recurrent prostate cancer: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Cancers. 2019;11(5):710. doi: 10.3390/cancers11050710</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Donswijk ML, van Leeuwen PJ, Vegt E, et al. Clinical impact of PSMA PET/CT in primary prostate cancer compared to conventional nodal and distant staging: a retrospective single center study. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07192-7 EDN: QXMNJG</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>The FDA approves PSMAtargeted drug for PET imaging in men with prostate cancer. BJU International. 2021;127(3):267–268. doi: 10.1111/bju.15361</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Caribé PRRV, Koole M, D'Asseler Y, et al. NEMA NU 2-2007 performance characteristics of GE Signa integrated PET/MR for different PET isotopes. EJNMMI Physics. 2019;1(6):11. doi: 10.1186/s40658-019-0247-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Giesel FL, Hadaschik B, Cardinale J, et al. F-18 labelled PSMA-1007: biodistribution, radiation dosimetry and histopathological validation of tumor lesions in prostate cancer patients. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2016;44(4):678–688. doi: 10.1007/s00259-016-3573-4 EDN: RQYCMY</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Kroenke M, Mirzoyan L, Horn T, et al. Matched-pair comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 18F-rhPSMA-7 PET/CT in patients with primary and biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: frequency of non–tumor-related uptake and tumor positivity. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2020;62(8):1082–1088. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.120.251447 EDN: EQTOAN</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Kwee TC, Takahara T, Ochiai R, et al. Diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS): features and potential applications in oncology. European Radiology. 2008;18(9):1937–1952. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-0968-z EDN: BJSYMC</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Parker C, Tunariu N, Tovey H, et al. Radium-223 in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scanning to assess response. JNCI Cancer Spectrum. 2023;7(6):pkad077. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkad077 EDN: AZWTFB</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Dresen RC, De Vuysere S, De Keyzer F, et al. Whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI for operability assessment in patients with colorectal cancer and peritoneal metastases. Cancer Imaging. 2019;19(1):1–10. doi: 10.1186/s40644-018-0187-z EDN: IEYSWA</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Yamamoto S, Yoshida S, Ishii C, et al. Metastatic diffusion volume based on apparent diffusion coefficient as a prognostic factor in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2021;54(2):401–408. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27596 EDN: SFBRHR</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Rowe SP, Pienta KJ, Pomper MG, Gorin MA. PSMA-RADS Version 1.0: a step towards standardizing the interpretation and reporting of PSMA–targeted PET imaging studies. European Urology. 2018;73(4):485–487. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.10.027</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Vasilev YA, Omelyanskaya OV, Vladzymyrskyy AV, et al. Comparison of multiparametric and biparametric magnetic resonance imaging protocols for prostate cancer diagnosis by radiologists with different experience. Digital Diagnostics. 2023;4(4):455–466. doi: 10.17816/dd322816 EDN: PVEPWX</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Disler DG, McCauley TR, Ratner LM, et al. In-phase and out-of-phase MR imaging of bone marrow: prediction of neoplasia based on the detection of coexistent fat and water. American Journal of Roentgenology. 1997;169(5):1439–1447. doi: 10.2214/ajr.169.5.9353477</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Suh CH, Yun SJ, Jin W, et al. Diagnostic Performance of in-phase and opposed-phase chemical-shift imaging for differentiating benign and malignant vertebral marrow lesions: a meta-analysis. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2018;211(4):W188–W197. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.19306</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Halpern SD. The continuing unethical conduct of underpowered clinical trials. JAMA. 2002;288(3):358–362. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.3.358</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Altman DG. Statistics and ethics in medical research: III How large a sample? BMJ. 1980;281(6251):1336–1338. doi: 10.1136/bmj.281.6251.1336</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Blokhin IA, Kodenko MR, Shumskaya YuF, et al. Hypothesis testing using R. Digital Diagnostics. 2023;4(2):238–247. doi: 10.17816/DD121368 EDN: OEKDAG</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Grünig H, Maurer A, Thali Y, et al. Focal unspecific bone uptake on [18F]-PSMA-1007 PET: a multicenter retrospective evaluation of the distribution, frequency, and quantitative parameters of a potential pitfall in prostate cancer imaging. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2021;48(13):4483–4494. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05424-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Silver DA, Pellicer I, Fair WR, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen expression in normal and malignant human tissues. Clin Cancer Res. 1997:3(1):81–85.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Plouznikoff N, Garcia C, Artigas C, et al. Heterogeneity of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT uptake in fibrous dysplasia. Clinical Nuclear Medicine. 2019;44(10):e593–e594. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000002609</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Gossili F, Lyngby CG, Løgager V, Zacho HD. Intense PSMA uptake in a vertebral hemangioma mimicking a solitary bone metastasis in the primary staging of prostate cancer via 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. Diagnostics. 2023;13(10):1730. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13101730 EDN: HQPGMR</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Hoyle JM, Layfield LJ, Crim J. The lipid-poor hemangioma: an investigation into the behavior of the “atypical” hemangioma. Skeletal Radiology. 2020;49:93–100. doi: 10.1007/s00256-019-03257-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Liao Z, Liu G, Ming B, et al. Evaluating prostate cancer bone metastasis using accelerated whole-body isotropic 3D T1-weighted Dixon MRI with compressed SENSE: a feasibility study. European Radiology. 2023;33(3):1719–1728. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-09181-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Park S, Park JG, Jun S, et al. Differentiation of bone metastases from prostate cancer and benign red marrow depositions of the pelvic bone with multiparametric MRI. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2020;73:118–124. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2020.08.019 EDN: CTHKSL</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Lee JH, Park S. Differentiation of schmorl nodes from bone metastases of the spine: use of apparent diffusion coefficient derived from DWI and fat fraction derived from a Dixon sequence. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2019;213(5):W228–W235. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.21003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Hottat NA, Badr DA, Ben Ghanem M, et al. Assessment of whole-body MRI including diffusion-weighted sequences in the initial staging of breast cancer patients at high risk of metastases in comparison with PET-CT: a prospective cohort study. European Radiology. 2023;34(1):165–178. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10060-0 EDN: MRFKMJ</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Johnston EW, Latifoltojar A, Sidhu HS, et al. Multiparametric whole-body 3.0-T MRI in newly diagnosed intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer: diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement for nodal and metastatic staging. European Radiology. 2018;29(6):3159–3169. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5813-4 EDN: DEXLFX</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Liu F, Dong J, Shen Y, et al. Comparison of PET/CT and MRI in the diagnosis of bone metastasis in prostate cancer patients: a network analysis of diagnostic studies. Frontiers in Oncology. 2021;11(APR):736654. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.736654 EDN: TKTQOV</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>Nakanishi K, Tanaka J, Nakaya Y, et al. Whole-body MRI: detecting bone metastases from prostate cancer. Japanese Journal of Radiology. 2021;40(3):229–244. doi: 10.1007/s11604-021-01205-6 EDN: QZBDSB</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>Sun W, Li M, Gu Y, et al. Diagnostic value of whole-body DWI with background body suppression plus calculation of apparent diffusion coefficient at 3 T Versus 18F-FDG PET/CT for detection of bone metastases. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2020;214(2):446–454. doi: 10.2214/ajr.19.21656 EDN: BJRCLP</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>Larbi A, Omoumi P, Pasoglou V, et al. Whole-body MRI to assess bone involvement in prostate cancer and multiple myeloma: comparison of the diagnostic accuracies of the T1, short tau inversion recovery (STIR), and high b-values diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences. European Radiology. 2018;29(8):4503–4513. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5796-1 EDN: CEOKNS</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Chen B, Wei P, Macapinlac HA, Lu Y. Comparison of 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP bone scan in detection of bone metastasis in prostate cancer. Nuclear Medicine Communications. 2019;40(9):940–946. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001051 EDN: ZRPGWP</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Gelezhe P.B. Comprehensive diagnostics of breast cancer using magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose, combined with computed tomography [dissertation]. Moscow; 2020. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=54413422 EDN: UGEBZO</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation>Freitag MT, Radtke JP, Hadaschik BA, et al. Comparison of hybrid 68Ga-PSMA PET/MRI and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in the evaluation of lymph node and bone metastases of prostate cancer. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2015;43(1):70–83. doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-3206-3 EDN: HXYHGT</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
