Economic and Political Aspects of Egypt’s Accession to BRICS

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The article focuses on the reasons why the Egyptian leadership decided to join BRICS in January 2024. The analysis of the Egyptian leadership’s public rhetoric has shown that the key motives for joining the organization are usually related to the economy: Egyptian politicians most often talk about expanding cooperation with the organization’s member countries, dedollarization and the New Development Bank. This is due to the fact that Egypt is facing serious economic problems, which relate to budget deficit, high inflation, trade deficit and devaluation of the national currency. BRICS cannot solve these Egyptian problems and is not a “silver bullet” but the benefits of joining, associated with economic cooperation and the New Development Bank, far outweigh the costs, which are limited to a small risk of deteriorating relations with the United States. BRICS does not impose rigid obligations on its members, which makes the organization attractive to countries with different political systems, allowing them to maintain balance in international relations with different actors thereof (such as the United States, China, Russia, India, European Union countries etc.)

About the authors

Andrey A. Ufimtsev

Institute for African Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences; HSE University

Email: aufimtsev@hse.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4870-4360
Junior Researcher, Centre for African Strategy in BRICS; Intern researcher, Center for Stability and Risks Analysis Moscow, Russian Federation

References

  1. Дейч Т.Л., Корендясов Е.Н. БРИКС - новый игрок на Африканском континенте. Азия и Африка сегодня. 2012. № 6. С. 18-23.
  2. Nuruzzaman M. 2020. Why BRICS Is No Threat to the Post-war Liberal World Order. International Studies. Vol. 57. Iss. 1. Pp. 51-66. doi: 10.1177/0020881719884449
  3. Davis M.L., Ferrantino M. Towards a positive theory of political rhetoric: Why do politicians lie? Public Choice. 1996. Vol. 88. Iss. 1-2. Pp. 1-13. doi: 10.1007/BF00130405
  4. Barnes J. Staple security: bread and wheat in Egypt. Staple security. Durham: Duke University Press. 2022. 296 p.
  5. Breisinger C., Kassim Y., Kurdi S., Randriamamonjy J., Thurlow J. 2024. From Food Subsidies to Cash Transfers: Assessing Economy-Wide Benefits and Trade-Offs in Egypt. Journal of African Economies. Vol. 33. Iss. 2. Pp. 109129. doi: 10.1093/jae/ejad006
  6. Воронина Н.А., Зеленова Д.А. Председательство ЮАР в БРИКС: от взаимовыгодного партнерства к построению нового миропорядка. Азия и Африка сегодня. 2023. № 11. С. 23-31.
  7. Киртон Д., Ларионова М. БРИКС. Первые 15 лет сотрудничества. Вестник международных организаций. 2022. Т. 17. № 2. C. 7-30.
  8. Клишин В.В., Павлов В.В. Новый банк развития БРИКС: проблемы создания и перспективы деятельности. Азия и Африка сегодня. 2015. № 9. С. 27-30.
  9. Kopiński D., Lubasiński J., Michalski B., Pilszyk M., Święcicki I., Wąsiński M. 2024. The Big Bang Enlargement. 20 Years of Central Europe’s Membership in the EU.
  10. Боброва В.В. Новый таможенный кодекс ЕАЭС как эффективный инструмент государственного регулирования внешней торговли. Региональная экономика и управление: электронный научный журнал. 2017. № 13(49). С. 499-511.
  11. Hazak G. 2012. The European Union - a federation or a confederation? Baltic Journal of European Studies. Vol. 2. Iss. 1. P. 11.
  12. Jonas J. 2006. Euro adoption and Maastricht criteria: Rules or discretion? Economic Systems. Vol. 30. Iss. 4. Pp. 328-345.
  13. Sasse G. 2005. EU conditionality and minority rights: Translating the Copenhagen criterion into policy.
  14. Taspinar O. Global South and the US Perception of BRICS Enlargement. Emirates Policy Center, 14.09.2023. https://epc.ae/en/details/scenario/global-south-and-the-us-perception-of-brics-enlargement (accessed 23.05.2024)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences