A Systematic Review of the Application of Machine Learning in CpG Island (CGI) Detection and Methylation Prediction


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Background:CpG island (CGI) detection and methylation prediction play important roles in studying the complex mechanisms of CGIs involved in genome regulation. In recent years, machine learning (ML) has been gradually applied to CGI detection and CGI methylation prediction algorithms in order to improve the accuracy of traditional methods. However, there are a few systematic reviews on the application of ML in CGI detection and CGI methylation prediction. Therefore, this systematic review aims to provide an overview of the application of ML in CGI detection and methylation prediction.

Methods:The review was carried out using the PRISMA guideline. The search strategy was applied to articles published on PubMed from 2000 to July 10, 2022. Two independent researchers screened the articles based on the retrieval strategies and identified a total of 54 articles. After that, we developed quality assessment questions to assess study quality and obtained 46 articles that met the eligibility criteria. Based on these articles, we first summarized the applications of ML methods in CGI detection and methylation prediction, and then identified the strengths and limitations of these studies.

Result:Finally, we have discussed the challenges and future research directions.

Conclusion:This systematic review will contribute to the selection of algorithms and the future development of more efficient algorithms for CGI detection and methylation prediction

About the authors

Rui Wei

Key Laboratory of Systems Health Science of Zhejiang Province, School of Life Science, Hangzhou Institute for Advanced Study, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences

Email: info@benthamscience.net

Le Zhang

Key Laboratory of Systems Health Science of Zhejiang Province, School of Life Science, Hangzhou Institute for Advanced Study, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences

Email: info@benthamscience.net

Huiru Zheng

School of Computing, Ulster University

Author for correspondence.
Email: info@benthamscience.net

Ming Xiao

College of Computer Science, Sichuan University

Author for correspondence.
Email: info@benthamscience.net

References

  1. Dor Y, Cedar H. Principles of DNA methylation and their implications for biology and medicine. Lancet 2018; 392(10149): 777-86. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31268-6 PMID: 30100054
  2. Wu H, Zhang Y. Reversing DNA methylation: mechanisms, genomics, and biological functions. Cell 2014; 156(1-2): 45-68. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.12.019 PMID: 24439369
  3. Zhang L, Xiao M, Zhou J, Yu J. Lineage-associated underrepresented permutations (LAUPs) of mammalian genomic sequences based on a Jellyfish-based LAUPs analysis application (JBLA). Bioinformatics 2018; 34(21): 3624-30. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty392 PMID: 29762634
  4. Takahashi Y, Wu J, Suzuki K, et al. Integration of CpG-free DNA induces de novo methylation of CpG islands in pluripotent stem cells. Science 2017; 356(6337): 503-8. doi: 10.1126/science.aag3260 PMID: 28473583
  5. Pongor CI, Bianco P, Ferenczy G, Kellermayer R, Kellermayer M. Optical trapping nanometry of hypermethylated CPG-island DNA. Biophys J 2017; 112(3): 512-22. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.12.029 PMID: 28109529
  6. Straussman R, Nejman D, Roberts D, et al. Developmental programming of CpG island methylation profiles in the human genome. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2009; 16(5): 564-71. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1594 PMID: 19377480
  7. Zhang L, Dai Z, Yu J, Xiao M. CpG-island-based annotation and analysis of human housekeeping genes. Brief Bioinform 2021; 22(1): 515-25. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbz134 PMID: 31982909
  8. Yang A, Zhang W, Wang J, Yang K, Han Y, Zhang L. Review on the application of machine learning algorithms in the sequence data mining of DNA. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2020; 8: 1032. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.01032 PMID: 33015010
  9. Tahir RA, Zheng D, Nazir A, Qing H. A review of computational algorithms for CpG islands detection. J Biosci 2019; 44(6): 143. doi: 10.1007/s12038-019-9961-8 PMID: 31894124
  10. Cai Y, Dong Q, Li A. Review of CpG island recognition algorithms. J Phys Conf Ser 2020; 1624(4): 042026. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1624/4/042026
  11. Chuang LY, Huang HC, Lin MC, Yang CH. Particle swarm optimization with reinforcement learning for the prediction of CpG islands in the human genome. PLoS One 2011; 6(6): e21036. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021036 PMID: 21738602
  12. Gardiner-Garden M, Frommer M. CpG Islands in vertebrate genomes. J Mol Biol 1987; 196(2): 261-82. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90689-9 PMID: 3656447
  13. Ku JL, Jeon YK, Park JG. Methylation-specific PCR. Methods Mol Biol 2011; 791: 23-32. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-316-5_3 PMID: 21913069
  14. Batzer MA, Deininger PL. Alu repeats and human genomic diversity. Nat Rev Genet 2002; 3(5): 370-9. doi: 10.1038/nrg798 PMID: 11988762
  15. Bock C, Walter J, Paulsen M, Lengauer T. CpG island mapping by epigenome prediction. PLOS Comput Biol 2007; 3(6): e110. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030110 PMID: 17559301
  16. Chen YH, Nyeo SL, Yeh CY. Model for the distributions of k -mers in DNA sequences. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 2005; 72(1): 011908. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.72.011908 PMID: 16090002
  17. Ji L, Sasaki T, Sun X, Ma P, Lewis ZA, Schmitz RJ. Methylated DNA is over-represented in whole-genome bisulfite sequencing data. Front Genet 2014; 5: 341. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00341 PMID: 25374580
  18. Catak FO, Balaban E. CloudSVM: Training an SVM classifier in cloud computing systems. 2013. Available from: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1301.0082.pdf
  19. Zhang Z. Naïve Bayes classification in R. Ann Transl Med 2016; 4(12): 241. doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.03.38 PMID: 27429967
  20. Rabiner L, Juang B. An introduction to hidden Markov models. IEEE ASSP Mag 1986; 3(1): 4-16. doi: 10.1109/MASSP.1986.1165342
  21. Song YY, Lu Y. Decision tree methods: Applications for classification and prediction. Shanghai Jingshen Yixue 2015; 27(2): 130-5. PMID: 26120265
  22. Breiman L. Random Forests. Mach Learn 2001; 45(1): 5-32. doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324
  23. Sutton RS, Barto AG. Reinforcement learning-an introduction cambridge, massachusetts. The MIT Press 2005.
  24. Sayers EW, Barrett T, Benson DA, et al. Database resources of the national center for biotechnology information. Nucleic Acids Res 2011; 39(Database): D38-51. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq1172 PMID: 21097890
  25. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021; 372(71): n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71 PMID: 33782057
  26. Lowe HJ, Barnett GO. Understanding and using the medical subject headings (MeSH) vocabulary to perform literature searches. JAMA 1994; 271(14): 1103-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.1994.03510380059038 PMID: 8151853
  27. Takai D, Jones PA. Comprehensive analysis of CpG islands in human chromosomes 21 and 22. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99(6): 3740-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.052410099 PMID: 11891299
  28. Luque-Escamilla PL, Martínez-Aroza J, Oliver JL, Gómez-Lopera JF, Román-Roldán R. Compositional searching of CpG islands in the human genome. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 2005; 71(6): 061925. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.71.061925 PMID: 16089783
  29. Yu N, Guo X, Zelikovsky A, Pan Y. GaussianCpG: A Gaussian model for detection of CpG island in human genome sequences. BMC Genomics 2017; 18(S4) (Suppl. 4): 392. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-3731-5 PMID: 28589860
  30. Garg P, Sharma S. Identification of CpG islands in DNA sequences using short-time fourier transform. Interdiscip Sci 2020; 12(3): 355-67. doi: 10.1007/s12539-020-00370-y PMID: 32394270
  31. Lai FL, Gao F. GC-Profile 2.0: An extended web server for the prediction and visualization of CpG islands. Bioinformatics 2021; 38(6): 1738-40.
  32. Ponger L, Mouchiroud D. CpGProD: Identifying CpG islands associated with transcription start sites in large genomic mammalian sequences. Bioinformatics 2002; 18(4): 631-3. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.4.631 PMID: 12016061
  33. Wang Y, Leung FCC. An evaluation of new criteria for CpG islands in the human genome as gene markers. Bioinformatics 2004; 20(7): 1170-7. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth059 PMID: 14764558
  34. Park HC, Ahn ER, Jung JY, et al. Enhanced sensitivity of CpG island search and primer design based on predicted CpG island position. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2018; 34: 134-40. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.02.013 PMID: 29477876
  35. Ye S, Asaithambi A, Liu Y. CpGIF: An algorithm for the identification of CpG islands. Bioinformation 2008; 2(8): 335-8. doi: 10.6026/97320630002335 PMID: 18685720
  36. Deininger P. Alu elements: Know the SINEs. Genome Biol 2011; 12(12): 236. doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-12-236 PMID: 22204421
  37. Rosenbloom KR, Sloan CA, Malladi VS, et al. ENCODE data in the UCSC Genome Browser: Year 5 update. Nucleic Acids Res 2013; 41: D56-63. PMID: 23193274
  38. Heisler LE, Torti D, Boutros PC, et al. CpG Island microarray probe sequences derived from a physical library are representative of CpG Islands annotated on the human genome. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33(9): 2952-61. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki582 PMID: 15911630
  39. Kakumani R, Ahmad O, Devabhaktuni V. Identification of CpG islands in DNA sequences using statistically optimal null filters. EURASIP J Bioinform Syst Biol 2012; 2012(1): 12. doi: 10.1186/1687-4153-2012-12 PMID: 22931396
  40. Yang CH, Lin YD, Chiang YC, Chuang LY. A hybrid approach for CpG island detection in the human genome. PLoS One 2016; 11(1): e0144748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144748 PMID: 26727213
  41. Fawcett T. An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognit Lett 2006; 27(8): 861-74. doi: 10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010
  42. Yu H, Sun C, Yang W, Xu S, Dan Y. A review of class imbalance learning methods in bioinformatics. Curr Bioinform 2015; 10(4): 360-9. doi: 10.2174/1574893609666140829204535
  43. Huska M, Vingron M. Improved prediction of non-methylated islands in vertebrates highlights different characteristic sequence patterns. PLOS Comput Biol 2016; 12(12): e1005249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005249 PMID: 27984582
  44. Tang J, Alelyani S, Liu H. Feature selection for classification: A review 2014. Available from: https://www.cse.msu.edu/~tangjili/publication/feature_selection_for_classification.pdf
  45. Kohavi R, John GH. Wrappers for feature subset selection. Artif Intell 1997; 97(1-2): 273-324. doi: 10.1016/S0004-3702(97)00043-X
  46. Cortes C, Vapnik V. Support-vector networks. Mach Learn 1995; 20(3): 273-97. doi: 10.1007/BF00994018
  47. Singer M, Engström A, Schönhuth A, Pachter L. Determining coding CpG islands by identifying regions significant for pattern statistics on Markov chains. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 2011; 10(1): 10. doi: 10.2202/1544-6115.1677 PMID: 23089814
  48. Irizarry RA, Wu H, Feinberg AP. A species-generalized probabilistic model-based definition of CpG islands. Mamm Genome 2009; 20(9-10): 674-80. doi: 10.1007/s00335-009-9222-5 PMID: 19777308
  49. Kakumani R, Ahmad MO, Devabhaktuni V. Identification of CpG islands in DNA sequences using matched filters. Annual International Conference. 2011; 2011: pp. 6029-32. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091490
  50. Leslie C, Eskin E, Noble WS. The spectrum kernel: a string kernel for SVM protein classification. Pac Symp Biocomput 2002; 564-75. PMID: 11928508
  51. Schweikert G, Zien A, Zeller G, et al. mGene: Accurate SVM-based gene finding with an application to nematode genomes. Genome Res 2009; 19(11): 2133-43. doi: 10.1101/gr.090597.108 PMID: 19564452
  52. Lee D, Karchin R, Beer MA. Discriminative prediction of mammalian enhancers from DNA sequence. Genome Res 2011; 21(12): 2167-80. doi: 10.1101/gr.121905.111 PMID: 21875935
  53. Wu H, Caffo B, Jaffee HA, Irizarry RA, Feinberg AP. Redefining CpG islands using hidden Markov models. Biostatistics 2010; 11(3): 499-514. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxq005 PMID: 20212320
  54. Hsieh F, Chen SC, Pollard K. A nearly exhaustive search for CpG islands on whole chromosomes. Int J Biostat 2009; 5(1): 5. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1158 PMID: 20148132
  55. Bäck T, Schwefel H-P. An overview of evolutionary algorithms for parameter optimization. Evol Comput 1993; 1(1): 1-23.
  56. Kennedy J, Eberhart R. Particle swarm optimization. In Proceedings of ICNN'95 - International Conference on Neural Networks. doi: 10.1109/ICNN.1995.488968
  57. Yang X-S. Chapter 8 - Particle Swarm Optimization. In Nature-Inspired Optimization Algorithms (Second Edition),. X.-S. Yang, ed. (Academic Press), 2021; pp. 111-21.https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-01368-0
  58. Whitehead SD, Sutton RS, Ballard DH. Advances in reinforcement learning and their implications for intelligent control. 5th IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control. 1289-97. doi: 10.1109/ISIC.1990.128621
  59. Hackenberg M, Previti C, Luque-Escamilla PL, Carpena P, Martínez-Aroza J, Oliver JL. CpGcluster: a distance-based algorithm for CpG-island detection. BMC Bioinforma 2006; 7(1): 446. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-446 PMID: 17038168
  60. Chuang LY, Yang CH, Lin MC, Yang CH. CpGPAP: CpG island predictor analysis platform. BMC Genet 2012; 13(1): 13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-13-13 PMID: 22385986
  61. Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A. EMBOSS: The European molecular biology open software suite. Trends Genet 2000; 16(6): 276-7. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02024-2 PMID: 10827456
  62. Xiao M, Li J, Hong S, et al. K-mer Counting: memory-efficient strategy, parallel computing and field of application for Bioinformatics IEEE Int Conf on Bioinformatic and Biomedicine. BIBM 2018; pp. 2561-7.
  63. Yang CH, Chiang YC, Chuang LY, Lin YD. 2018; A CpGCluster-teaching-learning-based optimization for prediction of CpG islands in the human genome. J Comput Biol 2018; 25(2): 158-69. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2016.0178
  64. Ribeca P, Raineri E. Faster exact Markovian probability functions for motif occurrences: a DFA-only approach. Bioinformatics 2008; 24(24): 2839-48. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn525 PMID: 18845582
  65. Spontaneo L, Cercone N. Correlating CpG islands, motifs, and sequence variants in human chromosome 21. BMC Genomics 2011; 12(Suppl 2): S10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-S2-S10 PMID: 21989037
  66. Benesch T. The Baum-Welch algorithm for parameter estimation of Gaussian autoregressive mixture models. J Math Sci 2001; 105(6): 2515-8. doi: 10.1023/A:1011342715567
  67. Mohamed Hashim EK, Abdullah R. Rare k-mer DNA: Identification of sequence motifs and prediction of CpG island and promoter. J Theor Biol 2015; 387: 88-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.09.014 PMID: 26427337
  68. Su J, Zhang Y, Lv J, et al. CpG_MI: A novel approach for identifying functional CpG islands in mammalian genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2010; 38(1): e6. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp882 PMID: 19854943
  69. Larrañaga P, Calvo B, Santana R, et al. Machine learning in bioinformatics. Brief Bioinform 2006; 7(1): 86-112. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbk007 PMID: 16761367
  70. Zhou G, Si J. A systematic and effective supervised learning mechanism based on Jacobian rank deficiency. Neural Comput 1998; 10(4): 1031-45. doi: 10.1162/089976698300017610 PMID: 9573418
  71. Kaelbling LP, Littman ML, Moore AW. Reinforcement learning: A survey. J Artif Intell Res 1996; 4: 237-85. doi: 10.1613/jair.301
  72. Saeys Y, Inza I, Larrañaga P. A review of feature selection techniques in bioinformatics. Bioinformatics 2007; 23(19): 2507-17. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm344 PMID: 17720704
  73. McCabe MT, Lee EK, Vertino PM. A multifactorial signature of DNA sequence and polycomb binding predicts aberrant CpG island methylation. Cancer Res 2009; 69(1): 282-91. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3274 PMID: 19118013
  74. Frommer M, McDonald LE, Millar DS, et al. A genomic sequencing protocol that yields a positive display of 5-methylcytosine residues in individual DNA strands. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992; 89(5): 1827-31. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.5.1827 PMID: 1542678
  75. Okuizumi H, Takamiya T, Okazaki Y, Hayashizaki Y. Restriction landmark genome scanning. Methods Mol Biol 2011; 791: 101-12. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-316-5_8 PMID: 21913074
  76. Fang F, Fan S, Zhang X, Zhang MQ. Predicting methylation status of CpG islands in the human brain. Bioinformatics 2006; 22(18): 2204-9. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl377 PMID: 16837523
  77. Ali I, Mohamoud HS. 2011; pp. An identification and prediction methods for feature-subsets of CpG islands methylation based on human peripheral blood leukocytes of chromosome 21q. Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Annual International Conference . 2011; pp. 3233-6. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6090879
  78. Feltus FA, Lee EK, Costello JF, Plass C, Vertino PM. Predicting aberrant CpG island methylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100(21): 12253-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2037852100 PMID: 14519846
  79. James P, Girijadevi R, Charles S, Pillai MR. MethFinder - A software package for prediction of human tissue-specific methylation status of CpG islands. Bioinformation 2013; 9(1): 61-4. doi: 10.6026/97320630009061 PMID: 23390346
  80. Wrzodek C, Büchel F, Hinselmann G, Eichner J, Mittag F, Zell A. Linking the epigenome to the genome: Correlation of different features to DNA methylation of CpG islands. PLoS One 2012; 7(4): e35327. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035327 PMID: 22558141
  81. Bonello N, Sampson J, Burn J, et al. Bayesian inference supports a location and neighbour-dependent model of DNA methylation propagation at the MGMT gene promoter in lung tumours. J Theor Biol 2013; 336: 87-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.07.019 PMID: 23911575
  82. Aliaga B, Bulla I, Mouahid G, Duval D, Grunau C. Universality of the DNA methylation codes in Eucaryotes. Sci Rep 2019; 9(1): 173. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37407-8 PMID: 30655579
  83. Weglarczyk S. Kernel density estimation and its application. ITM Web Conf 2018; 23. doi: 10.1051/itmconf/20182300037
  84. Bock C, Paulsen M, Tierling S, Mikeska T, Lengauer T, Walter J. CpG island methylation in human lymphocytes is highly correlated with DNA sequence, repeats, and predicted DNA structure. PLoS Genet 2006; 2(3): e26. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020026 PMID: 16520826
  85. Fan S, Zhang MQ, Zhang X. Histone methylation marks play important roles in predicting the methylation status of CpG islands. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2008; 374(3): 559-64. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.07.077 PMID: 18656446
  86. Zheng H, Wu H, Li J, Jiang SW. CpGIMethPred: computational model for predicting methylation status of CpG islands in human genome. BMC Med Genomics 2013; 6(S1) (Suppl. 1): S13. doi: 10.1186/1755-8794-6-S1-S13 PMID: 23369266
  87. Previti C, Harari O, Zwir I, del Val C. Profile analysis and prediction of tissue-specific CpG island methylation classes. BMC Bioinformatics 2009; 10(1): 116. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-116 PMID: 19383127
  88. Wang Y, Liu T, Xu D, et al. Predicting DNA methylation state of cpg dinucleotide using genome topological features and deep networks. Sci Rep 2016; 6(1): 19598. doi: 10.1038/srep19598 PMID: 26797014
  89. Wang Z, Cao R, Taylor K, Briley A, Caldwell C, Cheng J. The properties of genome conformation and spatial gene interaction and regulation networks of normal and malignant human cell types. PLoS One 2013; 8(3): e58793. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058793 PMID: 23536826
  90. Joachims T. Making large-scale SVM learning practical: University of Dortmund Technical Report No 1998; 28: 1998.
  91. Levy JJ, Titus AJ, Petersen CL, Chen Y, Salas LA, Christensen BC. MethylNet: an automated and modular deep learning approach for DNA methylation analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 2020; 21(1): 108. doi: 10.1186/s12859-020-3443-8 PMID: 32183722
  92. Chakraborty A, Ravi SP, Shamiya Y, Cui C, Paul A. Harnessing the physicochemical properties of DNA as a multifunctional biomaterial for biomedical and other applications. Chem Soc Rev 2021; 50(13): 7779-819. doi: 10.1039/D0CS01387K PMID: 34036968
  93. Feng P, Chen W, Lin H. Prediction of CpG island methylation status by integrating DNA physicochemical properties. Genomics 2014; 104(4): 229-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2014.08.011 PMID: 25172426
  94. Uroshlev LA, Abdullaev ET, Umarova IR, et al. A Method for identification of the methylation level of CpG islands from NGS data. Sci Rep 2020; 10(1): 8635. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65406-1 PMID: 32451390
  95. Bibikova M, Barnes B, Tsan C, et al. High density DNA methylation array with single CpG site resolution. Genomics 2011; 98(4): 288-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2011.07.007 PMID: 21839163
  96. Zhang W, Spector TD, Deloukas P, Bell JT, Engelhardt BE. Predicting genome-wide DNA methylation using methylation marks, genomic position, and DNA regulatory elements. Genome Biol 2015; 16(1): 14. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0581-9 PMID: 25616342
  97. Jiang L, Wang C, Tang J, Guo F. LightCpG: a multi-view CpG sites detection on single-cell whole genome sequence data. BMC Genomics 2019; 20(1): 306. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-5654-9 PMID: 31014252
  98. Wang H, He C, Kushwaha G, Xu D, Qiu J. A full Bayesian partition model for identifying hypo- and hyper-methylated loci from single nucleotide resolution sequencing data. BMC Bioinformatics 2016; 17(S1) (Suppl. 1): S7. doi: 10.1186/s12859-015-0850-3 PMID: 26818685
  99. Tang J, Zou J, Zhang X, et al. PretiMeth: precise prediction models for DNA methylation based on single methylation mark. BMC Genomics 2020; 21(1): 364. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-6768-9 PMID: 32414326
  100. Wei T, Nie J, Larson NB, et al. CpGtools: A python package for DNA methylation analysis. Bioinformatics 2021; 37(11): 1598-9. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz916 PMID: 31808791
  101. Cutler A, Cutler D, Stevens J. Random Forests 2011; 45: 157-76.
  102. Friedman J. Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Ann Stat 2000; 29.
  103. Chen T, Guestrin C. XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 2016; 785-94. doi: 10.1145/2939672.2939785
  104. Angermueller C, Lee HJ, Reik W, Stegle O. DeepCpG: Accurate prediction of single-cell DNA methylation states using deep learning. Genome Biol 2017; 18(1): 67. doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1189-z PMID: 28395661
  105. Dong S, Wang P, Abbas K. A survey on deep learning and its applications. Comput Sci Rev 2021; 40: 100379. doi: 10.1016/j.cosrev.2021.100379
  106. Nam D, Yoon SH, Kim JF. Ensemble learning of genetic networks from time-series expression data. Bioinformatics 2007; 23(23): 3225-31. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm514 PMID: 17977884
  107. Remeseiro B, Bolon-Canedo V. A review of feature selection methods in medical applications. Comput Biol Med 2019; 112: 103375. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.103375 PMID: 31382212
  108. Li L, Ching WK, Liu ZP. Robust biomarker screening from gene expression data by stable machine learning-recursive feature elimination methods. Comput Biol Chem 2022; 100: 107747. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2022.107747 PMID: 35932551
  109. Tutsoy O. Pharmacological, non-pharmacological policies and mutation: An artificial intelligence based multi-dimensional policy making algorithm for controlling the casualties of the pandemic diseases. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2021; 44(12): 9477-88.
  110. Tutsoy O, Balikci K, Ozdil NF. Unknown uncertainties in the COVID-19 pandemic: Multi-dimensional identification and mathematical modelling for the analysis and estimation of the casualties. Digit Signal Process 2021; 114: 103058.
  111. Affinito O, Palumbo D, Fierro A, et al. Nucleotide distance influences co-methylation between nearby CpG sites. Genomics 2020; 112(1): 144-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2019.05.007 PMID: 31078719
  112. Lövkvist C, Dodd IB, Sneppen K, Haerter JO. DNA methylation in human epigenomes depends on local topology of CpG sites. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44(11): 5123-32. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw124 PMID: 26932361
  113. El-Maarri O, Olek A, Balabau B, et al. Methylation levels at selected CpG sites in the factor VIII and FGFR3 genes, in mature female and male germ cells: Implications for male-driven evolution. Am J Hum Genet 1998; 63(4): 1001-8.
  114. Acton RJ, Yuan W, Gao F, et al. The genomic loci of specific human tRNA genes exhibit ageing-related DNA hypermethylation. Nat Commun 2021; 12(1): 2655. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22639-6 PMID: 33976121
  115. Liu B, Du Q, Chen L, et al. CpG methylation patterns of human mitochondrial DNA. Sci Rep 2016; 6(1): 23421. doi: 10.1038/srep23421 PMID: 26996456
  116. Jiang B, Dai W, Khaliq A, Carey M, Zhou X, Zhang L. Novel 3D GPU based numerical parallel diffusion algorithms in cylindrical coordinates for health care simulation. Math Comput Simul 2015; 109: 1-19. doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2014.07.003
  117. Jiang B, Struthers A, Sun Z, et al. Employing graphics processing unit technology, alternating direction implicit method and domain decomposition to speed up the numerical diffusion solver for the biomedical engineering research. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng 2011; 27(11): 1829-49. doi: 10.1002/cnm.1444
  118. Zhang L, Jiang B, Wu Y, et al. Developing a multiscale, multi-resolution agent-based brain tumor model by graphics processing units. Theor Biol Med Model 2011; 8(1): 46. doi: 10.1186/1742-4682-8-46 PMID: 22176732
  119. Xiao M, Liu G, Xie J, et al. 2019nCoVAS: Developing the web service for epidemic transmission prediction, Genome analysis, and psychological stress assessment for 2019-nCoV. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2021; 18: pp. (4)1250-61. doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2021.3049617 PMID: 33406042
  120. Xiao M, Yang X, Yu J, Zhang L. CGIDLA: Developing the web server for CpG island related density and LAUPs (lineage-associated underrepresented permutations) study. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinformatics 2020; 17(6): 2148-54. doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2019.2935971 PMID: 31443042
  121. Preis T, Virnau P, Paul W, Schneider JJ. GPU accelerated Monte Carlo simulation of the 2D and 3D Ising model. J Comput Phys 2009; 228(12): 4468-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2009.03.018
  122. Stone JE, Hardy DJ, Ufimtsev IS, Schulten K. GPU-accelerated molecular modeling coming of age. J Mol Graph Model 2010; 29(2): 116-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2010.06.010 PMID: 20675161
  123. Zhang L, Zhang L, Guo Y, et al. MCDB: A comprehensive curated mitotic catastrophe database for retrieval, protein sequence alignment, and target prediction. Acta Pharm Sin B 2021; 11(10): 3092-104. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.05.032 PMID: 34729303
  124. Lee CA, Gasster SD, Plaza A, Chang CI, Huang B. Recent developments in high performance computing for remote sensing: A review. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 2011; 4(3): 508-27. doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2011.2162643

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2024 Bentham Science Publishers