Effect of Probiotic Lactobacteria on the Intestinal Microbiota and Morphological and Physiological Indicators of Quail

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

The work shows the effect of adding Lactiplantibacillus plantarum AG10 biomass to quail feed. Quails that received a probiotic feed additive for seven weeks showed a significant improvement in such economic indicators as the dynamics of live weight, gutted carcass weight and feed consumption per 1 kg of gain. Using the analysis of libraries of 16S rRNA gene sequences sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq platform, shifts in the microbiota of the cecum were discovered, which can help improve the morphological and physiological parameters of quails.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

E. Gavrilova

Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: Alalila@yandex.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Kazan, 420008

O. Karaseva

Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University

Email: Alalila@yandex.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Kazan, 420008

Y. Monir

Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University

Email: Alalila@yandex.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Kazan, 420008

A. Ezhkova

Kazan State Academy of Veterinary Medicine named after N.E. Bauman

Email: Alalila@yandex.ru
俄罗斯联邦, 420061, Kazan

V. Ezhkov

Kazan State Academy of Veterinary Medicine named after N.E. Bauman

Email: Alalila@yandex.ru
俄罗斯联邦, 420061, Kazan

R. Volkov

Kazan State Academy of Veterinary Medicine named after N.E. Bauman

Email: Alalila@yandex.ru
俄罗斯联邦, 420061, Kazan

A. Senina

Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University

Email: Alalila@yandex.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Kazan, 420008

D. Khusnutdinova

Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University

Email: Alalila@yandex.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Kazan, 420008

E. Nikitina

Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University; Kazan National Research Technological University

Email: Alalila@yandex.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Kazan, 420008; Kazan, 420015

D. Yarullina

Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University

Email: Alalila@yandex.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Kazan, 420008

A. Kayumov

Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University

Email: Alalila@yandex.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Kazan, 420008

参考

  1. Алиев М. Ш., Захаров В. П., Прокофьева Р. Г. Факторы повышения качества продукции и эффективности птицеводства в Республике Татарстан // Ученые записки Казанской государственной академии ветеринарной медицины им. Н. Э. Баумана. 2008. Т. 193. С. 12‒15.
  2. Полонский В. И., Сумина А. В. Влияние физических характеристик зернового сырья на функциональную ценность кормов для птиц // Вестн. Российского университета дружбы народов. Сер. Агрономия и животноводство. 2021. Т. 16. № 2. С. 167‒175.
  3. Путивская Т. Б., Норовяткин В. И. Проект повышения эффективности разведения перепелов // Региональные агросистемы: экономика и социология. 2022. № 3. С. 56‒62.
  4. Beck B. R., Park G. S., Jeong D. Y., Lee Y. H., Im S., Song W. H., Kang J. Multidisciplinary and comparative investigations of potential psychobiotic effects of Lactobacillus strains isolated from newborns and their impact on gut microbiota and ileal transcriptome in a healthy murine model // Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2019. V. 9. Art. 269.
  5. Campana R., van Hemert S., Baffone W. Strain-specific probiotic properties of lactic acid bacteria and their interference with human intestinal pathogens invasion // Gut Pathogens. 2017. V. 9. Art. 12.
  6. Gavrilova E., Anisimova E., Gabdelkhadieva A., Nikitina E., Vafina A., Yarullina D., Bogachev M., Kayumov A. Newly isolated lactic acid bacteria from silage targeting biofilms of foodborne pathogens during milk fermentation // BMC Microbiol. 2019. V. 19. P. 1‒12.
  7. Hill C., Guarner F., Reid G., Gibson G. R., Merenstein D. J., Pot B., Sanders M E. Expert consensus document. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic // Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2014. V. 11. P. 506–514.
  8. Jha R., Das R., Oak S., Mishra P. Probiotics (direct-fed microbials) in poultry nutrition and their effects on nutrient utilization, growth and laying performance, and gut health: a systematic review // Animals. 2020. V. 10. Art. 1863.
  9. Lozupone C., Lladser M. E., Knights D., Stombaugh J., Knight R. UniFrac: an effective distance metric for microbial community comparison // ISME J. 2011. V. 5. P. 169‒172.
  10. Park Y. H., Hamidon F., Rajangan C., Soh K. P., Gan C. Y., Lim T. S., Abdullah W. N.W., Liong M. T. Application of probiotics for the production of safe and high-quality poultry meat // Korean J. Food Sci. Animal Resour. 2016. V. 36. P. 567‒576.
  11. Pourtorabi E., Farzin F., Seraj A. Effects of genetic and non-genetic factors on body weight and carcass related traits in two strains of Japanese quails // Poultry Sci. J. 2017. V. 5. P. 17‒24.
  12. Stanley D., Hughes R. J., Geier M. S., Moore R. J. Bacteria within the gastrointestinal tract microbiota correlated with improved growth and feed conversion: challenges presented for the identification of performance enhancing probiotic bacteria // Front. Microbiol. 2016. V. 7. Art. 187.
  13. Stojanov S., Berlec A., Štrukelj B. The influence of probiotics on the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio in the treatment of obesity and inflammatory bowel disease // Microorganisms. 2020. V. 8. Art. 1715.
  14. Tolnai E., Fauszt P., Fidler G., Pesti-Asboth G., Szilagyi E., Stagel A., Paholcsek M. Nutraceuticals induced changes in the broiler gastrointestinal tract microbiota // MSystems. 2021. V. 6. Art. e01124-20.
  15. Wilkinson N., Hughes R. J., Aspden W. J., Chapman J., Moore R. J., Stanley D. The gastrointestinal tract microbiota of the Japanese quail, Coturnix japonica // Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016. V. 100. P. 4201‒4209.
  16. Zaefarian F., Abdollahi M. R., Cowieson A., Ravindran V. Avian liver: the forgotten organ // Animals (Basel). 2019. V. 9. Art. 63.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载
2. Supplement
下载 (98KB)
索引源数据
3. Fig. 1. The effect of applying L. plantarum AG10 as a probiotic additive to feed on the weight of quails and feed conversion: a – live weight of quails during the experiment; b – mass of gutted carcass at the end of the experiment; c – mass of the muscular stomach at the end of the experiment; d – feed conversion rate (kg of compound feed / kg of live masses) on the 44th day of the experiment (indicated by the arrow in Fig. 1a). * – Significant difference at p < 0.05 in the Mann test‒Whitney.

下载 (112KB)
索引源数据
4. Fig. 2. The effect of L. plantarum AG10 as a probiotic additive in quail feed on the relative content of taxa: a – at the type level; b – at the family level; c ‒ the presence of bacteria of the Staphylococcaceae, Enterococcoceae and Lactobacillaceae families in the cecum of quails.

下载 (208KB)
索引源数据
5. Fig. S1. The effect of L. plantarum AG10 as a probiotic additive in quail feed on the biodiversity indices of the microbial community of the cecum: taxonomic diversity indices ((a) – Chao1; (d) – Shannon index; (e) – Simpson index), Faith`s PD phylogenetic diversity index (b) and the number of OTE (in).

下载 (83KB)
索引源数据
6. Figure S2. The effect of L. plantarum AG10 as a probiotic additive in quail feed on the relative content of taxa ((a) – at the class level; (b) – at the level of detachments; (c) – at the level of genera).

下载 (277KB)
索引源数据

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024