Shock waves in a one-dimensional semi-infinite hyperelastic rod

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The excitation of a harmonic wave in a semi–infinite incompressible hyperelastic one-dimensional rod (material according to the Mooney–Rivlin model) leads to the formation and propagation of shock wave fronts arising between half-waves of the initial harmonic wave moving at different speeds. Shock wave fronts lead to the absorption of slow-moving parts by faster ones and, consequently, reduce both kinetic energy and elastic deformation energy with the corresponding release of heat. The explicit Lax–Wendroff difference scheme in combination with the finite element method is used to solve geometrically and physically nonlinear equations of motion.

About the authors

S. V. Kuznetsov

Institute of Problems of Mechanical Engineering RAS named after A.Yu. Ishlinsky; National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (NIU MGSU)

Email: kuzn-sergey@yandex.ru
Москва, Россия; Москва, Россия

V. A. Mitroshin

National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (NIU MGSU)

Email: mitroshin.vasiliy@yandex.ru
Москва, Россия

References

  1. Rankine W.J.M. On the thermodynamic theory of waves of finite longitudinal disturbances // Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 1870. Т. 160. С. 277–286.
  2. Cui W., Mu X., Chen W., Stephens T.A., Bledsoe B.P. Emergency control scheme for upstream pools of long-distance canals // Irrig. Drain. 2018. V. 68. № 2. P. 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.2297
  3. Hunter J.K., Keller J.B. Caustics of nonlinear waves // Wave Motion. 1987. V. 9. № 5. P. 429–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-2125(87)90031-X
  4. Sasoh A., Ohtani T., Mori K. Pressure effect in a shock-wave plasma interaction induced by a focused laser pulse // Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006. V. 97 № 20. P. 205004. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.205004
  5. Znamenskaya I.A., Koroteev D.A., Lutskiy A.E. Discontinuity breakdown on shock wave interaction with nanosecond discharge // Phys. Fluids. 2008. V. 20. P. 056101. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2908010
  6. Kulikovskii A.G. Multi-parameter fronts of strong discontinuities in continuum mechanics // J. Appl. Math. Mech. 2011. V. 75. № 4. P. 378–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappmathmech.2011.09.002
  7. Zhang S. Shock wave evolution and discontinuity propagation for relativistic superfluid hydrodynamics with spontaneous symmetry breaking // Phys. Lett. B. 2014. V. 729. P. 136–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2014.01.014
  8. Morduchow M., Libby P.A. On the distribution of entropy through a shock wave // J. Mécanique. 1965. V. 4. P. 191–213.
  9. Zeldovich Y.B., Raizer Y.P. Physics of shock waves and high-temperature hydrodynamic phenomena, 2nd ed. New York: Academic Press, 1967.
  10. Ridah A. Shock waves in water // J. Appl. Phys. 1988. V. 64. P. 152–158. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.341448
  11. Arima T., Taniguchsi S., Ruggeri T., Sugiyama T. Extended thermodynamics of dense gases // Contin. Mech. Thermodyn. 2012. V. 24. P. 271–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00161-011-0213-x
  12. Velasco R.M., Garcia-Colin L.S., Uribe F.J. Entropy production: Its role in nonequilibrium thermodynamics // Entropy. 2011. V. 13. № 1. P. 82–116. https://doi.org/10.3390/e13010082
  13. Margolin L.G. Nonequilibrium entropy in a shock // Entropy. 2017. V. 19. № 7. P. 368. https://doi.org/10.3390/e19070368
  14. Hafskjold B., Bedeaux D., Kjelstrup S., Wilhelmsen A. Nonequilibrium thermodynamics of surfaces captures the energy conversions in a shock wave // Chem. Phys. Lett. 2020. V. 738. P. 100054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpletx.2020.100054
  15. Pence T.J., Gou K. On compressible stress of the incompressible neo-Hookean material // Math. Mech. Solids. 2015. V. 20. № 3. P. 157–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1081286514544258
  16. Maslov V.P., Mosolov P.P. General theory of the solutions of the equations of motion of an elastic medium of different moduli // J. Appl. Math. Mech. 1985. V. 49. № 3. С. 322–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8928(85)90031-0
  17. Ostrovsky L.A. Wave processes in media with strong acoustic nonlinearity // J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1991. V. 90. P. 3332–3337. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.401444
  18. Kuznetsov S.V. Love waves in nondestructive diagnostics of layered composites // Survey. Acoust. Phys. 2010. V. 56. P. 877–892. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063771010060126
  19. Lucchesi M., Pagni A. Longitudinal oscillations of bimodular rods // Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn. 2005. V. 5. P. 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455405001490
  20. Gavrilov S.N., Herman G.C. Wave propagation in a semi-infinite heteromodular elastic bar subjected to a harmonic loading // J. Sound Vib. 2012. V. 331. № 20. P. 444–4480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2012.05.022
  21. Naeeni M.R., Eskandari-Ghadi M., Ardalan A.A., Pak R.Y.S., Rahimian M., Hayati Y. Coupled thermoviscoelastodynamic Green’s functions for bi-material half-space // Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 2015. V. 95. № 3. P. 260–282. https://doi.org/10.1002/zamm.201200135
  22. Li S.J., Brun M., Djeran-Maigre I., Kuznetsov S. Hybrid asynchronous absorbing layers based on Kosloff damping for seismic wave propagation in unbounded domains // Comput. Geotech. 2019. V. 109. P. 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.01.019
  23. Kuznetsova M., Khudyakov M., Sadovskiy I. Wave propagation in continuous bimodular media // Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct. 2022. V. 29. № 21. P. 3147–3162. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2021.1889725
  24. Truesdell C. General and exact theory of waves in finite elastic strain // Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 1961. V. 8. P. 263–296. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.2495
  25. Coleman B.D., Gurtin M.E., Herrera I. Waves in materials with memory, I. The velocity of one-dimensional shock and acceleration waves // Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 1965. V. 19. P. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00252275
  26. Truesdell C. On curved shocks in steady plane flow of an ideal fluid // J. Aeronaut. Sci. 1952. V. 19. P. 826–834. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.2495
  27. Boulanger P., Hayes M.A. Finite amplitude waves in Mooney–Rivlin and Hadamard materials // In: Topics in Finite Elasticity. Vienna: Springer, 2001.
  28. Liu C., Cady C.M., Lovato M.L., Orler E.B. Uniaxial tension of thin rubber liner sheets and hyperelastic model investigation // J. Mater. Sci. 2015. V. 50. P. 1401–1411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-014-8700-7
  29. Hill R. Acceleration waves in solids // J. Mech. Phys. Solids. 1962. V. 10. № 1. P. 1–16.
  30. Hashiguchi K. Nonlinear continuum mechanics for finite elasticity-plasticity. New York: Elsevier, 2020.
  31. LeVeque R.J. Numerical Methods for Conservation Laws. Boston: Birkhäuser, 1992.
  32. Press W.H., Teukolsky S.A., Vetterling W.T., Flannery B.P. Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing, 3rd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  33. Ilyashenko A.V., Kuznetsov S.V. Theoretical aspects of applying Lamb waves in nondestructive testing of anisotropic media // Russ. J. Nondestr. Test. 2017. V. 5. P. 243–259. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830917040039
  34. Truesdell C., Noll W. The non-linear field theories of mechanics, 3rd ed. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 2004.
  35. Kuznetsov S.V. Closed form analytical solution for dispersion of Lamb waves in FG plates // Wave Motion. 2019. V. 84. P. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wavemoti.2018.09.018
  36. Li S., Brun M., Djeran-Maigre I., Kuznetsov S. Explicit/implicit multi-time step co-simulation in unbounded medium with Rayleigh damping and application for wave barrier // Europ. J. Environ. Civil Eng. 2000. V. 24. № 14. С. 2400–2421. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2018.1506826
  37. Grady D.E. Shock-wave compression of brittle solids // Mechanics of Materials. 1998. V. 29. № 3–4. P. 181–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6636(98)00015-5
  38. Lion A. On the large deformation behaviour of reinforced rubber at different temperatures // J. Mech. Phys. Solids. 1997. V. 45. № 11-12. P. 1805–1834. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5096(97)00028-8
  39. LeMet PD. Hyperbolic Systems of conservation laws and the mathematical theory of shock waves. Philadelphia: SIAM, 1972.
  40. Belytschko T., Liu W.K., Moran B., Elkhodary K. Nonlinear finite elements for continua and structures. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 2013.
  41. Dumbser M. Arbitrary-Lagrangian–Eulerian ADER-WENO finite volume schemes with time-accurate local time stepping for hyperbolic conservation laws // Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2014. V. 280. P. 57–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2014.07.019
  42. Neto M.A., Amaro A., Rosero L., Cime J., Leal R. Finite element method for trusses // In: Engineering Computation of Structures: The Finite Element Method. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17710-6_3
  43. Jerrams S., Bowen J. Modelling the behaviour of rubber-like materials to obtain components with rigidity modulus tests // WIT Trans. Model. Simul. 1995. V. 12. P. CMEM95061. https://doi.org/10.2495/CMEM950561
  44. Chen J., Garcia E.S., Zimmerman S.C. Intramolecularly cross-linked polymers: From structure to function with applications as artificial antibodies and artificial enzymes // Acc. Chem. Res. 2020. V. 53. № 6. P. 1244–1256. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00178
  45. D’Amato M., Gigliotti R., Laguardia R. Seismic isolation for protecting historical buildings: A case study // Front. Built Environ. 2019. V. 5. P. 87. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2019.00087
  46. Goldstein R.V., Dudenko A.V., Kuznetsov S.V. The modified Cam-Clay (MCC) model: Cyclic kinematic deviatoric loading // Arch. Appl. Mech. 2016. V. 86. P. 2021–2031. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-016-1169-x
  47. Carcione J.M., Kosloff D. Representation of matched-layer kernels with viscoelastic mechanical models // Int. J. Numer. Anal. Model. 2013. V. 10. P. 221–232.
  48. Li S., Brun M., Djeran-Maigre I., Kuznetsov S. Benchmark for three-dimensional explicit asynchronous absorbing layers for ground wave propagation and wave barriers // Comput. Geotech. 2021. V. 131. P. 103808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103808
  49. Kuznetsov S. Fundamental and singular solutions of Lamb equations for media with arbitrary elastic anisotropy // Q. Appl. Math. 2005. V. 63. P. 455–467. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0033-569X-05-00969-X
  50. Kuznetsov S. Seismic waves and seismic barriers // Acoust. Phys. 2011. V. 57. P. 420–426. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063771011030109
  51. Haris A., Alveras P., Mohammadipour M., Mahony M.O. Design and validation of a nonlinear vibration absorber to attenuate torsional oscillations of propulsion systems // Nonlinear Dyn. 2020. V. 100. P. 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-020-05502-z
  52. Safari S., Tannieraj R. Parametric study of stochastic seismic responses of base-isolated liquid storage tanks under near-fault and far-fault ground motions // J. Vib. Control. 2018. V. 24. № 24. P. 5747–5764. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546316647576
  53. Carranza J.C., Brennan M.J., Tang B. Sources and propagation of nonlinearity in a vibration isolator with geometrically nonlinear damping // J. Vibr. Acoust. 2015. V. 138. № 2. P. 024501. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4031997
  54. Zhu Y.P., Lang Z.Q. Beneficial effects of antisymmetric nonlinear damping with application to energy harvesting and vibration isolation under general inputs // Nonlinear Dyn. 2022. V. 108. С. 2917–2933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-022-07444-0
  55. Harris C., Piersol A. Harris shock and vibration handbook, 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2002.
  56. Kuznetsov S. Subsonic Lamb waves in anisotropic plates // Q. Appl. Math. 2002. V. 60. P. 577–587. https://doi.org/10.1090/qam/1914442
  57. Carboni B., Lacarbonara W. Nonlinear dynamic characterization of a new hysteretic device: Experiments and computations // Nonlinear Dyn. 2016. V. 83. P. 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-015-2305-9
  58. Kuznetsov S. “Forbidden” planes for Rayleigh waves // Q. Appl. Math. 2002. V. 60. P. 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1090/qam/1878260
  59. Tian J.H., Luo Y., Zhao L. Regional stress field in Yunnan revealed by the focal mechanisms of moderate and small earthquakes // Earth Planet. Phys. 2019. V. 3. № 3. P. 243–252. https://doi.org/10.26464/epp2019024
  60. Ben-Menahem S., Singh S.J. Seismic Waves and Sources. New York: Springer, 2011.
  61. Sutton G.H., Mitronovas W., Pomeroy P.W. Short-period seismic energy radiation patterns from underground nuclear explosions and small-magnitude earthquakes // Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 1967. V. 57. P. 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0570020249
  62. Dudchenko A.V., Dias D. Vertical wave barriers for vibration reduction // Arch. Appl. Mech. 2020. V. 91. P. 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-020-01768-2
  63. Placinta A.-O., Borleanu F., Moldovan I.-A., Coman A. Correlation between seismic waves velocity changes and the occurrence of moderate earthquakes at the bending of the Eastern Carpathians (Vrancea) // Acoustics. 2022. V. 4. № 4. P. 934–947. https://doi.org/10.3390/acoustics4040057
  64. Petrescu L., Borleanu F., Radulian M., Ismail-Zadeh A., Mătenco L. Tectonic regimes and stress patterns in the Vrancea Seismic Zone: Insights into intermediate-depth earthquake nests in locked collisional settings // Tectonophysics. 2021. V. 799. P. 228688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2020.228688
  65. Rankine W.J.M. On the thermodynamic theory of waves of finite longitudinal disturbances // Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 1870. Т. 160. С. 277–286.
  66. Cui W., Mu X., Chen W., Stephens T.A., Bledsoe B.P. Emergency control scheme for upstream pools of long-distance canals // Irrig. Drain. 2018. V. 68. № 2. P. 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.2297
  67. Hunter J.K., Keller J.B. Caustics of nonlinear waves // Wave Motion. 1987. V. 9. № 5. P. 429–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-2125(87)90031-X
  68. Sasoh A., Ohtani T., Mori K. Pressure effect in a shock-wave plasma interaction induced by a focused laser pulse // Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006. V. 97 № 20. P. 205004. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.205004
  69. Znamenskaya I.A., Koroteev D.A., Lutskiy A.E. Discontinuity breakdown on shock wave interaction with nanosecond discharge // Phys. Fluids. 2008. V. 20. P. 056101. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2908010
  70. Kulikovskii A.G. Multi-parameter fronts of strong discontinuities in continuum mechanics // J. Appl. Math. Mech. 2011. V. 75. № 4. P. 378–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappmathmech.2011.09.002
  71. Zhang S. Shock wave evolution and discontinuity propagation for relativistic superfluid hydrodynamics with spontaneous symmetry breaking // Phys. Lett. B. 2014. V. 729. P. 136–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2014.01.014
  72. Morduchow M., Libby P.A. On the distribution of entropy through a shock wave // J. Mécanique. 1965. V. 4. P. 191–213.
  73. Zeldovich Y.B., Raizer Y.P. Physics of shock waves and high-temperature hydrodynamic phenomena, 2nd ed. New York: Academic Press, 1967.
  74. Ridah A. Shock waves in water // J. Appl. Phys. 1988. V. 64. P. 152–158. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.341448
  75. Arima T., Taniguchsi S., Ruggeri T., Sugiyama T. Extended thermodynamics of dense gases // Contin. Mech. Thermodyn. 2012. V. 24. P. 271–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00161-011-0213-x
  76. Velasco R.M., Garcia-Colin L.S., Uribe F.J. Entropy production: Its role in nonequilibrium thermodynamics // Entropy. 2011. V. 13. № 1. P. 82–116. https://doi.org/10.3390/e13010082
  77. Margolin L.G. Nonequilibrium entropy in a shock // Entropy. 2017. V. 19. № 7. P. 368. https://doi.org/10.3390/e19070368
  78. Hafskjold B., Bedeaux D., Kjelstrup S., Wilhelmsen A. Nonequilibrium thermodynamics of surfaces captures the energy conversions in a shock wave // Chem. Phys. Lett. 2020. V. 738. P. 100054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpletx.2020.100054
  79. Pence T.J., Gou K. On compressible stress of the incompressible neo-Hookean material // Math. Mech. Solids. 2015. V. 20. № 3. P. 157–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1081286514544258
  80. Maslov V.P., Mosolov P.P. General theory of the solutions of the equations of motion of an elastic medium of different moduli // J. Appl. Math. Mech. 1985. V. 49. № 3. С. 322–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8928(85)90031-0
  81. Ostrovsky L.A. Wave processes in media with strong acoustic nonlinearity // J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1991. V. 90. P. 3332–3337. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.401444
  82. Kuznetsov S.V. Love waves in nondestructive diagnostics of layered composites // Survey. Acoust. Phys. 2010. V. 56. P. 877–892. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063771010060126
  83. Lucchesi M., Pagni A. Longitudinal oscillations of bimodular rods // Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn. 2005. V. 5. P. 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455405001490
  84. Gavrilov S.N., Herman G.C. Wave propagation in a semi-infinite heteromodular elastic bar subjected to a harmonic loading // J. Sound Vib. 2012. V. 331. № 20. P. 444–4480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2012.05.022
  85. Naeeni M.R., Eskandari-Ghadi M., Ardalan A.A., Pak R.Y.S., Rahimian M., Hayati Y. Coupled thermoviscoelastodynamic Green’s functions for bi-material half-space // Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 2015. V. 95. № 3. P. 260–282. https://doi.org/10.1002/zamm.201200135
  86. Li S.J., Brun M., Djeran-Maigre I., Kuznetsov S. Hybrid asynchronous absorbing layers based on Kosloff damping for seismic wave propagation in unbounded domains // Comput. Geotech. 2019. V. 109. P. 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.01.019
  87. Kuznetsova M., Khudyakov M., Sadovskiy I. Wave propagation in continuous bimodular media // Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct. 2022. V. 29. № 21. P. 3147–3162. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2021.1889725
  88. Truesdell C. General and exact theory of waves in finite elastic strain // Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 1961. V. 8. P. 263–296. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.2495
  89. Coleman B.D., Gurtin M.E., Herrera I. Waves in materials with memory, I. The velocity of one-dimensional shock and acceleration waves // Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 1965. V. 19. P. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00252275
  90. Truesdell C. On curved shocks in steady plane flow of an ideal fluid // J. Aeronaut. Sci. 1952. V. 19. P. 826–834. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.2495
  91. Boulanger P., Hayes M.A. Finite amplitude waves in Mooney–Rivlin and Hadamard materials // In: Topics in Finite Elasticity. Vienna: Springer, 2001.
  92. Liu C., Cady C.M., Lovato M.L., Orler E.B. Uniaxial tension of thin rubber liner sheets and hyperelastic model investigation // J. Mater. Sci. 2015. V. 50. P. 1401–1411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-014-8700-7
  93. Hill R. Acceleration waves in solids // J. Mech. Phys. Solids. 1962. V. 10. № 1. P. 1–16.
  94. Hashiguchi K. Nonlinear continuum mechanics for finite elasticity-plasticity. New York: Elsevier, 2020.
  95. LeVeque R.J. Numerical Methods for Conservation Laws. Boston: Birkhäuser, 1992.
  96. Press W.H., Teukolsky S.A., Vetterling W.T., Flannery B.P. Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing, 3rd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  97. Ilyashenko A.V., Kuznetsov S.V. Theoretical aspects of applying Lamb waves in nondestructive testing of anisotropic media // Russ. J. Nondestr. Test. 2017. V. 5. P. 243–259. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830917040039
  98. Truesdell C., Noll W. The non-linear field theories of mechanics, 3rd ed. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 2004.
  99. Kuznetsov S.V. Closed form analytical solution for dispersion of Lamb waves in FG plates // Wave Motion. 2019. V. 84. P. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wavemoti.2018.09.018
  100. Li S., Brun M., Djeran-Maigre I., Kuznetsov S. Explicit/implicit multi-time step co-simulation in unbounded medium with Rayleigh damping and application for wave barrier // Europ. J. Environ. Civil Eng. 2000. V. 24. № 14. С. 2400–2421. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2018.1506826
  101. Grady D.E. Shock-wave compression of brittle solids // Mechanics of Materials. 1998. V. 29. № 3–4. P. 181–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6636(98)00015-5
  102. Lion A. On the large deformation behaviour of reinforced rubber at different temperatures // J. Mech. Phys. Solids. 1997. V. 45. № 11-12. P. 1805–1834. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5096(97)00028-8
  103. LeMet PD. Hyperbolic Systems of conservation laws and the mathematical theory of shock waves. Philadelphia: SIAM, 1972.
  104. Belytschko T., Liu W.K., Moran B., Elkhodary K. Nonlinear finite elements for continua and structures. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 2013.
  105. Dumbser M. Arbitrary-Lagrangian–Eulerian ADER-WENO finite volume schemes with time-accurate local time stepping for hyperbolic conservation laws // Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2014. V. 280. P. 57–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2014.07.019
  106. Neto M.A., Amaro A., Rosero L., Cime J., Leal R. Finite element method for trusses // In: Engineering Computation of Structures: The Finite Element Method. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17710-6_3
  107. Jerrams S., Bowen J. Modelling the behaviour of rubber-like materials to obtain components with rigidity modulus tests // WIT Trans. Model. Simul. 1995. V. 12. P. CMEM95061. https://doi.org/10.2495/CMEM950561
  108. Chen J., Garcia E.S., Zimmerman S.C. Intramolecularly cross-linked polymers: From structure to function with applications as artificial antibodies and artificial enzymes // Acc. Chem. Res. 2020. V. 53. № 6. P. 1244–1256. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00178
  109. D’Amato M., Gigliotti R., Laguardia R. Seismic isolation for protecting historical buildings: A case study // Front. Built Environ. 2019. V. 5. P. 87. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2019.00087
  110. Goldstein R.V., Dudenko A.V., Kuznetsov S.V. The modified Cam-Clay (MCC) model: Cyclic kinematic deviatoric loading // Arch. Appl. Mech. 2016. V. 86. P. 2021–2031. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-016-1169-x
  111. Carcione J.M., Kosloff D. Representation of matched-layer kernels with viscoelastic mechanical models // Int. J. Numer. Anal. Model. 2013. V. 10. P. 221–232.
  112. Li S., Brun M., Djeran-Maigre I., Kuznetsov S. Benchmark for three-dimensional explicit asynchronous absorbing layers for ground wave propagation and wave barriers // Comput. Geotech. 2021. V. 131. P. 103808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103808
  113. Kuznetsov S. Fundamental and singular solutions of Lamb equations for media with arbitrary elastic anisotropy // Q. Appl. Math. 2005. V. 63. P. 455–467. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0033-569X-05-00969-X
  114. Kuznetsov S. Seismic waves and seismic barriers // Acoust. Phys. 2011. V. 57. P. 420–426. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063771011030109
  115. Haris A., Alveras P., Mohammadipour M., Mahony M.O. Design and validation of a nonlinear vibration absorber to attenuate torsional oscillations of propulsion systems // Nonlinear Dyn. 2020. V. 100. P. 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-020-05502-z
  116. Safari S., Tannieraj R. Parametric study of stochastic seismic responses of base-isolated liquid storage tanks under near-fault and far-fault ground motions // J. Vib. Control. 2018. V. 24. № 24. P. 5747–5764. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546316647576
  117. Carranza J.C., Brennan M.J., Tang B. Sources and propagation of nonlinearity in a vibration isolator with geometrically nonlinear damping // J. Vibr. Acoust. 2015. V. 138. № 2. P. 024501. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4031997
  118. Zhu Y.P., Lang Z.Q. Beneficial effects of antisymmetric nonlinear damping with application to energy harvesting and vibration isolation under general inputs // Nonlinear Dyn. 2022. V. 108. С. 2917–2933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-022-07444-0
  119. Harris C., Piersol A. Harris shock and vibration handbook, 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2002.
  120. Kuznetsov S. Subsonic Lamb waves in anisotropic plates // Q. Appl. Math. 2002. V. 60. P. 577–587. https://doi.org/10.1090/qam/1914442
  121. Carboni B., Lacarbonara W. Nonlinear dynamic characterization of a new hysteretic device: Experiments and computations // Nonlinear Dyn. 2016. V. 83. P. 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-015-2305-9
  122. Kuznetsov S. «Forbidden» planes for Rayleigh waves // Q. Appl. Math. 2002. V. 60. P. 87–97. https://dx.doi.org/10.1090/qam/1878260
  123. Tian J.H., Luo Y., Zhao L. Regional stress field in Yunnan revealed by the focal mechanisms of moderate and small earthquakes // Earth Planet. Phys. 2019. V. 3. № 3. P. 243–252. https://doi.org/10.26464/epp2019024
  124. Ben-Menahem S., Singh S.J. Seismic Waves and Sources. New York: Springer, 2011.
  125. Sutton G.H., Mitronovas W., Pomeroy P.W. Short-period seismic energy radiation patterns from underground nuclear explosions and small-magnitude earthquakes // Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 1967. V. 57. P. 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0570020249
  126. Dudchenko A.V., Dias D. Vertical wave barriers for vibration reduction // Arch. Appl. Mech. 2020. V. 91. P. 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-020-01768-2
  127. Placinta A.-O., Borleanu F., Moldovan I.-A., Coman A. Correlation between seismic waves velocity changes and the occurrence of moderate earthquakes at the bending of the Eastern Carpathians (Vrancea) // Acoustics. 2022. V. 4. № 4. P. 934–947. https://doi.org/10.3390/acoustics4040057
  128. Petrescu L., Borleanu F., Radulian M., Ismail-Zadeh A., Mătenco L. Tectonic regimes and stress patterns in the Vrancea Seismic Zone: Insights into intermediate-depth earthquake nests in locked collisional settings // Tectonophysics. 2021. V. 799. P. 228688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2020.228688

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2025 Russian Academy of Sciences