Fundamentals of dual-energy computed tomography and its emerging applications in bladder cancer
- Authors: Masino F.1, Eusebi L.2, Montatore M.1, Muscatella G.1, Gifuni R.1, Ferrara V.2, Marcellini M.3, Guglielmi G.1,4,5
-
Affiliations:
- Foggia University School of Medicine
- “Carlo Urbani” Hospital
- “Senigallia” Hospital
- “Dimiccoli” Hospital
- “IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza” Hospital
- Issue: Vol 5, No 3 (2024)
- Pages: 551-566
- Section: Reviews
- Submitted: 29.12.2023
- Accepted: 06.02.2024
- Published: 04.12.2024
- URL: https://jdigitaldiagnostics.com/DD/article/view/625405
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/DD625405
- ID: 625405
Cite item
Abstract
Nowadays, computed tomography urography and multiparametric magnetic resonance are the most often used imaging techniques in patients with bladder cancer; however, dual-energy computed tomography is making its way into the oncological field. This narrative review article aimed to show the fundamentals of dual-energy computed tomography by outlining its physical principles, techniques, protocols, and postprocessing images to help those who used this cutting-edge technology as the first approach to fully understand its emerging applications in the evaluation of bladder cancer, a field yet to be explored. In particular, we discuss the usefulness of dual-energy computed tomography by focusing on the main images obtained, such as the iodine map, comparing them to the images obtained with conventional computed tomography scans.
Dual-energy computed tomography applications may be beneficial for bladder cancer diagnosis, staging, and treatment planning. Nevertheless, its application is limited to its availability in healthcare structures and the training of healthcare personnel who can perform and interpret the scans correctly.
Full Text
INTRODUCTION
Bladder Cancer
Bladder Cancer (BCa) is the tenth most prevalent malignancy worldwide. Among urogenital tumors, it ranks second, preceded by prostate cancer [1]. It is more frequent in White people, older people (peak incidence at 70 years old), and men (male-to-female ratio of 4:1). Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is the most common type of BCa, which accounts for 90% of cases [2]. It develops from urothelial cells, typical cells lining the urinary system. Multifocality and recurrence are characteristic of this tumor presentation [3, 4].
Tobacco use, some herbs, occupational exposure to aromatic amines (such as β-naphthylamine, benzidine, and 4-aminobiphenyl), history of radiation therapy to the pelvis, chronic bladder problems, and schistosomiasis may increase a person’s risk of developing BCa [5, 6].
The primary presenting symptom that requires prompt investigation is the so-called painless hematuria. It indicates the asymptomatic presence of blood in the urine, which can be macroscopic, if grossly visible, or microscopic, if only detectable under a microscope.
As the urinary system is involved, other symptoms include pollakiuria, pelvic pain, and urinary tract infections. If the tumor is located at the vesicoureteral junction, the patient may complain of a lumbar flank plain, which is due to ureteral obstruction and subsequent hydronephrosis. Systemic symptoms, such as fatigue, fever, and weight loss, are associated with metastatic progression and occur later.
A morphological classification of BCa is based on muscle involvement [7]. The non-muscle invasive BCa (NMIBC), which is a tumor type characterized by its superficiality and usual papillary extension. This type of tumor is present in 70%–80% of patients with BCa. It is superficial because it arises from the epithelium that becomes hyperplastic but remains limited to the mucosa and lamina propria. In only approximately 33% of cases, when the NMIBC is a high-grade tumor (malignant carcinoma in situ), this tumor has a flat appearance, shortly invades the muscle plane, and metastasizes [8, 9].
Muscle-invasive BCa (MIBC) arises in 20%–30% of cases and does not have a papillary presentation. The fast infiltration of all bladder wall layers, passing the latter, and arriving outside the organ, makes this tumor aggressive with a poor prognosis. Distant spread through the lymph nodes starts at a locoregional level and then reaches the common iliac, paracaval, and lumbar–aortic chain. Distant spread via blood most commonly affects the lungs, bone, liver, and adrenal glands [10, 11].
The TNM 8th edition is the current system used for BCa staging, which can be also grouped into grades, resulting in BCa grading [12, 13] (Tables 1 and 2).
Table 1. TNM staging (8th edition) | |
T | |
Ta | Noninvasive papillary tumor |
Tis | In situ (noninvasive flat) |
T1 | Through the lamina propria into the subepithelial connective tissues |
T2 | Into the muscularis propria |
T2a: invasion of the inner half of the muscle only | |
T2b: invasion into the outer half of the muscle | |
T3 | Invasion into the perivesical tissues |
T3a: Microscopic extravesical invasion | |
T3b: Invades into the outer half of the muscle | |
T4 | Direct invasion into adjacent structures |
T4a: Prostate, seminal vesicles, uterus, and vaginal vault | |
T4b: Pelvic side wall and/or abdominal wall | |
N | |
N0 | No nodal involvement |
N1 | Single node in the true pelvis (hypogastric, obturator, external iliac, or presacral nodes) |
N2 | Multiple nodes in the true pelvis |
N3 | Metastasis in a common iliac node |
M | |
M0 | No metastases |
M1a | Nonregional lymph node involvement |
M1b | Other distant metastasis |
Table. 2. Grading of bladder cancer | |
Grading | |
0 | Ta or Tis, N0, and M0 |
I | T1, N0, and M0 |
II | T2 (a or b), N0, and M0 |
III | T3 (a or b) or T4a, N0, and M0 |
IV | T4b, any N, any M or any T, N1-3, and any M |
Dual-energy computed tomography
Fundamentals
Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) is an innovative technology that produces various imaging datasets by concurrently operating two X-ray tubes with two different kilovoltages. Its fundamental elements are the same as conventional imaging with X-rays: the power of the X-ray tube, Compton and photoelectric effects, and characteristics of the material.
DECT operates on the premise that materials respond in a specific way to various X-ray photon energies. Therefore, every material with its proper energy-dependent attenuation profiles is obtained with two different energies.
The basis for tissue differentiation on CT and DECT is the attenuation of the photons as they go through and interact with the tissue. The attenuation, expressed in Hounsfield units (HUs), depends on the properties of the material, specifically its atomic number (Z), and electron density. Instead, it is inversely proportional to the radiant energy generated by the tube (kVp): it is greater if low-energy photons are used compared with high-energy ones [14].
At the energy levels used in medical imaging, the interaction between photons and body tissues depends on the photoelectric and Compton effects. The photoelectric effect is energy-dependent and is related to the atomic number (Z), whereas the Compton effect is energy-independent and is related to electron density (mass).
The tissue or contrast material inside the area of interest is characterized by having spectral features, which means that it has an actuation that differs depending on the photon energy. This principle allows DECT to make distinctions between materials.
As a result, materials with a high Z, such as iodine (Z=53), are mainly affected by the photoelectric effect, an interaction that leads to increased attenuation when subjected to a lower energy beam (80–100 kVp), generating a spectral contrast with the biological tissues at DECT. On the contrary, the Compton effect affected mainly materials with low Z, such as oxygen, nitrogen, hydrogen, and carbon (all materials with a Z of 1–8). Calcium is affected nearly equally by the two effects [15].
In summary, each material has a specific Z value and absorption of photons (attenuation) that changes according to the photon energy. In particular, water has a straight line, whereas fat reduces the attenuation values as we approach the lowest energy (40–45 keV) (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1. Different attenuation at different energy ranges of iodine, calcium, water, and fat. Iodine has the highest attenuation value for low kEv compared with fat that has the lowest. The attenuation values of water not influenced by different energies. Calcium has an average behavior compared with others.
Subsequently, each tissue results from all these variables of each component, as can be water or fat. For example, soft tissue is made up of materials with comparable Z values, and it results in attenuation without discernible differences [14].
Technique
The examinations of cases presented in this narrative review were performed on a single-source scanner with Rapid Kilovoltage Switching (Revolution CT GSI Xtream, GE Healthcare) (Table 3).
Table 3. Major characteristics of this single-source dual-energy computed tomography system. | |
Single-source DECT with Rapid Kilovoltage Switching (SsDECT) | |
Schematic illustration of a type of Ss-DECT. Yellow is used to illustrate the low-energy spectrum, whereas blue presents the high-energy spectrum. The detector can rapidly register information from exposure at both energies. | |
Prospective technique | |
Single X-ray tube that switches between high (140 kVp) and low (80 kVp) energies in 0.25 ms and within the same gantry rotation. | |
Reconstruction in the projection space with deep-learning image reconstruction | |
Full field of view | |
Slight reduction in temporal resolution due to tube rotation | |
80 mm GSI collimation; 50 cm GSI FOV; neutral dose, rumor index; hyper drive pitch, 1.531:1; 256 detectors; maximum coverture, 16 cm. | |
The multi-phase acquisition protocol was used. As the first step, an unenhanced scan of the abdomen and pelvis was performed. Then, patients were given furosemide intravenously to delineate the pelvicalyceal system and ureters better and produce more homogenous opacification of the urine bladder.
The post-contrast phases are as follows: corticomedullary phase, obtained 30–40 s after the injection; nephrographic phase, acquired 90–110 s after contrast administration; pyelographic phase, late excretory phase, obtained after 8–12 min from the intravenous administration of the contrast medium (Table 4).
Table 4. Schematic protocol with preparation, acquisition phases, Z-axis extension, and scan direction. | ||
PROTOCOL | ||
Preparation | Furosemide: 10–20 mg before the corticomedullary phase | |
Acquisition Phases | Basal | |
Corticomedullary | ROI in the abdominal sopraceliac aorta; threshold HU, 150; after 18–20 s from reaching the bolus-tracking threshold | |
Nephrographic | 80–100 s from the intravenous injection of the contrast medium | |
Excretory | 7–10 min from the intravenous injection of the medium contrast | |
Z-axis extension | From the diaphragmatic cupola to the pubic symphysis for the basal and nephrographic phases. | |
From the superior renal pole to the pubic symphysis for the corticomedullary and excretory phases. | ||
Scan direction | Craniocaudal | |
Considering the usefulness of each phase:
- The unenhanced phase allows the detection of calcifications and calcific stones, which appear hyperdense, and hemorrhages, with typical blood density. Moreover, it is useful to measure the attenuation coefficients of a urothelial masses before contrast injection [16–18].
- The corticomedullary phase allows the detection of vascular variations or the presence of arterial enhancements.
- The nephrographic phase allows a better characterization of renal lesions and subsequently their detection [19–20].
- The pyelographic phase allows the detection of urothelium variations with distension, evaluated through the opacification of the urinary system starting from the collecting systems, passing through the ureters until the bladder [21–24].
From the CT, a 3D reconstruction of the urinary tract can be obtained. It represents an evolution of classical urography, and it allows a complete visual of the urinary system, providing information about the morphology and functionality of the kidneys and excretory tract, enhancing malformations, stones, or solid neoformations. It is indicated in the case of hematuria, diagnosis of kidney–ureter–bladder tumors, or stone pain to detect and localize the stone (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2. 3D reconstruction obtained from CT urography with a contrast medium, with (a) and without (b) bones in the background in a coronal plane.
Reconstructions
Unlike traditional single-energy CT, which yields a single image set, DECT can reconstruct various image types. The following are those used for BCa evaluation [25].
Virtual mono-chromatic images
Virtual mono-chromatic (VMC) images are post-processed images generated by a complex algorithm that generates image quality similar to conventional polychromatic single-energy CT but provides more trustworthy attenuation values.
Two energies applied offer different properties to VMC images. Low energy is responsible for an increased contrast between structures that are near, explained by the high beam attenuation of iodine. In this way, a parietal lesion is easier to evaluate. Meanwhile, high energy is responsible for less noise and artifacts and less contrast between nearby structures.
By using two different kilovoltage sets (high and low energies), from the VMC images, also a spectral attenuation curve, a function of energies is obtained. The latter is attributed to its properties, which is useful to improve lesion characterization.
By acquiring VMC images at different energies, a spectral attenuation curve, which is a function of different energies, is obtained, useful for its properties to improve lesion [14].
Virtual noncontrast images (iodine removed)
Virtual noncontrast (VNC) images are postprocessing images obtained by separating specific materials to create images “without contrast” from scans acquired after contrast administration [26, 27]. Therefore, this postprocessing image has the potential to replace the traditional first scan acquired without contrast during CT [28, 29].
The material suppressed is iodine, and the kind of image obtained is also called “iodine removed.” It means that any iodine uptake identified during DECT multiphasic acquisition is identified and suppressed to generate a VNC scan.
The main advantage of this unique and exclusive imaging technique only referrable to DECT is that it does not require patients to undergo multiple scans, reducing the total amount of radiation dose.
Furthermore, the effort and time required to conduct subsequent investigations can be significantly reduced [30].
Iodine map
Using a complex algorithm, it is possible to select a material with its proper attenuation features and generate a material-specific image. For example, by selecting a high attenuation material such as iodine, an iodine-specific image, known as iodine map, is generated [31].
As the opposite of an iodine-removed image, the iodine map indicates all areas with iodine uptake. Therefore, this kind of postprocessing image enables iodine quantification, expressed in milligrams/milliliter (mg/mL) [14, 32].
Iodine density is then typically overlaid as a color map on traditional CT scans, with voxel values representing iodine concentration in mg/mL. The iodine map can differentiate a vascular from a nonvascular lesion. Quantifying iodine and normalizing it to the amount of iodine present in the aorta is an indirect measure of the vascularity of the region of interest. The optimum thresholds for distinguishing vascular from nonvascular lesions vary from the type of DECT platform, with 0.5 mg/mL for dsDE; 1.3 mg/mL for rsDE, and 0.5 mg/mL for dlDE [31, 33].
Quantifying iodine in the nephrographic phase and normalizing it to the quantity of iodine in the aorta are better: \left|I\right|\ normalized=\left|I\right|\sfrac{lesion}{\left|I\right|}aorta.
Atomic map
An effective atomic number map (Zeff) is used to quantitatively assess material differentiation and evaluate attenuation variations as a function of energy (Fig. 3) [34].
Fig. 3. Atomic map with the histograph.
Bladder Cancer and Dual-energy computed tomography
In oncologic imaging, CT is essential owing to its accessibility, prompt acquisition time, and high image quality. In patients with suspected BCa, it is the most commonly used technique for the detection and avoidance of misdiagnosis for other potential causes of hematuria. On the contrary, it represents the gold standard for staging to evaluate locoregional and distant extent of disease [7, 35].
The primary limitations of CT are their high radiation dose (25–35 mSv) and the inability to distinguish MIBC and NMIBC BCa [6]. Repeated acquisition phases, particularly in patients with oncologic problems who may require follow-up CTs, raise the issue of ionizing radiation overexposure and frequent injection of iodinated contrast media. In addition to dose reduction, the risk of nephropathy must be also considered in patients with kidney disorders who undergo numerous CT examinations for follow-up. Accordingly, the focus of attention has shifted to new technologies such as DECT, which can provide benefits to both radiologists and patients in tumor diagnosis and monitoring [36].
DECT is a new imaging technique that owing to its technological qualities, it is particularly useful in oncologic imaging. The evident benefits of DECT concern lesion characterization, tumor detection, and lowering the need for additional imaging examinations and biopsies. This is possible thanks to postprocessing reconstruction such as VNC images, VMC images, spectral curves, and iodine maps.
VNC images do not differ considerably from the true unenhanced images, and they can disclose stones, calcifications, and hemorrhages that appear hyperdense in non-contrast CT scans. Moreover, measuring the attenuation coefficients of a mass to compare its value to that obtained in post-enhanced scans is essential [37, 38].
The spectral curve with its properties is useful to improve lesion characterization. For example, a nodular formation of the bladder wall has a curve that goes to the high for lower values of keV (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4. Spectral curve that allows the characterization of materials because each material has a different attenuation curve. Using different energies, different materials can be differentiated based on the attenuation of the same at the two energy levels.
Lesion extension may be better evaluated, thanks to the use of a VMC image at low-energy kilovoltage that improves the contrast-to-noise ratio. In particular, this image emphasized the suspicious lesion from the surrounding area. The lesions with their appropriate hypo- or hyperenhancement are more viewable than the enhancing background parenchyma. Considering that enhancement is also measurable, VMC images improve lesion detection and characterization (Fig. 5) [39, 40].
Fig. 5. Virtual monochromatic images at 40 keV, (a) giving better enhancement of the contrast medium with greater noise; at 140 keV (b) with less contrast, artifacts, and noise.
Nakagawa et al. showed that DECT is more effective compared with conventional CT urography to detect small and low-enhanced BCas that might be harder to recognize: The different contrast between BCa and the bladder wall was more evident in the VMC image [41].
By examining the presence and absence of iodine, iodine maps can be used to quantify iodine in each voxel and, in this way, detect slight contrast enhancements to characterize the lesion. Iodine maps can be also used to distinguish vascular and nonvascular lesions, always for lesion characterization. In this case, in the nephrographic phase, iodine quantification must be normalized to the aorta. An iodine concentration threshold of ≥1.0 mg I/mL shows high sensitivity (92%) for urothelial tumors. High specificity (92%) can be reached at a threshold of ≥3.0 mg I/mL (Figs. 6–8) [42].
Fig. 6. A patient with hematuria in anticoagulant therapy and suspicion of a clot. (a) Axial plane of an iodine map obtained in the arterial phase. Av = 26.79 represents the mg/mL of iodine concentration with a threshold of 1.3 mg/mL. CT shows that the lesion contains iodine and is therefore highly suspicious for bladder neoformation. The iodine map with color overlay obtained from an arterial phase CT in axial (b) and coronal (c) planes shows the lack of hydroxyapatite content.
Fig. 7. A patient with hematuria suspected of bladder lesion. (a) The CT axial plane shows modest bladder wall thickening with significant concentration of iodine, which indicates high suspicion of lesion. AV represents the concentration in mg/mL of iodine, which is 6.7 and 16.48 for the blue circle and yellow marker (threshold value of 1.3 mg/mL), respectively. (b and c) Spectral curve that allows the characterization of materials because each material has a different attenuation curve.
Fig. 8. CT image in the nephrographic phase useful for quantifying iodine concentration and normalizing it to the amount of iodine in the aorta. (a) Iodine map showing various solid nodules that adhered to the bladder wall and (b) iodine map with color overlap improves leasion visualization. The average value for the lesion is 1.5 mg/mL, the Av value of the iliac artery is 8.4 mg/mL, and the threshold is 1.3 mg/mL.
In summary, the iodine map derived from DECT provides more information than conventional CT because it allows the quantification of iodine content in the lesion and offers a better trustworthy measurement of lesion enhancement. It can be used as a surrogate marker for tissue contrast media uptake, considering that it is not affected by innate tissue attenuation, and does not require evaluation of pre- and post-contrast enhancement of true enhanced image. In the latter case, multiple post-contrast scans, such as the arterial and portal venous scans, must be studied before lesion characterization [14].
DECT may also be useful for staging. Therefore, iodine maps may assess tumor extension both locally to evaluate the infiltration of all bladder wall layers and at a distance to evaluate lymph node involvement and presence of metastases.
Moreover, DECT can be employed not only for lesion characterization and staging but also for treatment planning. In fact, assessing therapy is crucial to understanding BCa extension and assessing the presence of connections with the vascular structure. For this purpose, low-energy VMC images are better postprocessing images and depict with better efficacy the relation between the lesion and surrounding vascular structures. Moreover, as images may be isotropically captured, from the DECT acquisition, maximum intensity projection that can give surgeons a vascular guide can be also reconstructed [14, 43].
Additional DECT advantages may be useful in tumor comorbidities, for example, renal colic, and detection of tumor-related disorders, such as pulmonary embolism or bowel ischemia [44, 45].
However, the current limitations to the use of DECT must be considered, particularly the need for specific equipment and technology, which may only be available in some healthcare facilities. Indeed, it is a high-cost technology that may not be accessible in all healthcare settings, not allowing intra- and interdepartmental comparisons, particularly in the follow-up. Moreover, image scanning and interpretation require qualified and trained staff with advanced training.
CONCLUSION
DECT is a cutting-edge technology that generates various imaging datasets by concurrently operating two X-ray tubes at two distinct kilovoltage levels: one lower and one higher.
The application of DECT in the oncology field is an emergent and revolutionary discovery. In particular, in patients with suspected BCa, postprocessing images provide more information than conventional CT urography to detect the lesion and better characterize it.
Therefore, DECT is analogous to CT considering the image acquisition process; however, postprocessing is exclusive to DECT and allows the production of various other images, such as VNC, VMC, spectral curves, and iodine maps. Each image type can provide more details and knowledge and assist radiologists in making a more certain diagnosis of BCa while benefiting the patient by shortening diagnosis timelines.
DECT may not be limited to the detection of a potentially malignant lesion but also to the staging and treatment planning of tumors such as BCa. In particular, the combination of low-energy images and iodine maps may allow for better depiction and characterization of primary and secondary lesions. Nevertheless, DECT is unavailable in all healthcare settings and requires trained healthcare personnel.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Funding source. This article was not supported by any external sources of funding.
Competing interests. The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contribution. All authors made a substantial contribution to the conception of the work, acquisition, analysis, interpretation of data for the work, drafting and revising the work, final approval of the version to be published and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. L. Eusebi, F. Masino, G. Guglielmi — work conception and design; V. Ferrara, M. Marcellini, L. Eusebi — data collection; F. Masino, L. Eusebi, M. Montatore, G. Muscatella, R. Gifuni — manuscript writing and editing.
About the authors
Federica Masino
Foggia University School of Medicine
Email: federicamasino@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0004-4289-3289
MD
Italy, FoggiaLaura Eusebi
“Carlo Urbani” Hospital
Email: lauraeu@virgilio.it
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4172-5126
MD
Italy, JesiManuela Montatore
Foggia University School of Medicine
Email: manuela.montatore@unifg.it
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-1526-5047
MD
Italy, FoggiaGianmichele Muscatella
Foggia University School of Medicine
Email: muscatella94@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0004-3535-5802
MD
Italy, FoggiaRossella Gifuni
Foggia University School of Medicine
Email: rossella.gifuni@unifg.it
ORCID iD: 0009-0009-9679-3861
MD
Italy, FoggiaVincenzo Ferrara
“Carlo Urbani” Hospital
Email: vincenzoferrara4@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8625-4308
MD
Italy, JesiMassimo Marcellini
“Senigallia” Hospital
Email: massimo.marcellini@sanita.marche.it
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5281-7819
MD
Italy, SenigalliaGiuseppe Guglielmi
Foggia University School of Medicine; “Dimiccoli” Hospital; “IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza” Hospital
Author for correspondence.
Email: giuseppe.guglielmi@unifg.it
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4325-8330
MD, Professor
Italy, Foggia; Barletta; San Giovanni RotondoReferences
- Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(1):7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590
- Soria F, Shariat SF, Lerner SP, et al. Epidemiology, diagnosis, preoperative evaluation and prognostic assessment of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). World J Urol. 2017;35(3):379–387. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1928-x
- Verma S, Rajesh A, Prasad SR, et al. Urinary bladder cancer: role of MR imaging. Radiographics. 2012;32(2):371–387. doi: 10.1148/rg.322115125
- Rouprêt M, Babjuk M, Burger M, et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 2020 Update. Eur Urol. 2021;79(1):62–79. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.042
- Farling KB. Bladder cancer: Risk factors, diagnosis, and management. Nurse Pract. 2017;42(3):26–33. doi: 10.1097/01.NPR.0000512251.61454.5c
- Eusebi L, Masino F, Gifuni R, et al. Role of multiparametric-MRI in bladder cancer. Current Radiology Reports. 2023;11(5):69–80. doi: 10.1007/s40134-023-00412-5
- Babjuk M, Burger M, Capoun O, et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (Ta, T1, and Carcinoma in Situ). Eur Urol. 2022;81(1):75–94. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.08.010
- Babjuk M, Böhle A, Burger M, et al. EAU Guidelines on Non-Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: Update 2016. Eur Urol. 2017;71(3):447–461. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.041
- Kamoun A, de Reyniès A, Allory Y, et al. A consensus molecular classification of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. European Urology. 2020;77(4):420–433. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.09.006
- Wang Z, Shang Y, Luan T, et al. Evaluation of the value of the VI-rads scoring system in assessing muscle infiltration by bladder cancer. Cancer Imaging. 2020;20(1). doi: 10.1186/s40644-020-00304-3
- Husband JE, Olliff JF, Williams MP, Heron CW, Cherryman GR. Bladder cancer: staging with CT and MR imaging. Radiology. 1989;173(2):435–440. doi: 10.1148/radiology.173.2.2798874
- Wong VK, Ganeshan D, Jensen CT, Devine CE. Imaging and management of Bladder Cancer. Cancers. 2021;13(6):1396. doi: 10.3390/cancers13061396
- Agrawal MD, Pinho DF, Kulkarni NM, et al. Oncologic applications of dual-energy CT in the abdomen. Radiographics. 2014;34(3):589–612. doi: 10.1148/rg.343135041
- Johnson T. Dual-Energy CT: General Principles. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199(5 Suppl):S3–S8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9116
- Potenta SE, D’Agostino R, Sternberg KM, Tatsumi K, Perusse K. CT Urography for Evaluation of the Ureter. Radiogr Rev Publ Radiol Soc N Am Inc. 2015;35:709–726. doi: 10.1148/rg.2015140209
- Kawashima A, Vrtiska TJ, Leroy AJ, et al. CT Urography. Radiogr Rev Publ Radiol Soc N Am Inc. 2004;24:S35–S54. doi: 10.1148/rg.24si045513
- Caoili EM, Cohan RH. CT urography in evaluation of urothelial tumors of the kidney. Abdom. Radiol. 2016;41:1100–1107. doi: 10.1007/s00261-016-0695-x
- Cheng K, Cassidy F, Aganovic L, Taddonio M, Vahdat N. CT urography: How to optimize the technique. Abdom. Radiol. 2019;44:3786–3799. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-02111-2
- Silverman SG, Leyendecker JR, Amis ES. What Is the Current Role of CT Urography and MR Urography in the Evaluation of the Urinary Tract? Radiology. 2009;250:309–323. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2502080534
- Shampain KL, Cohan RH, Caoili EM, Davenport MS, Ellis JH. Benign diseases of the urinary tract at CT and CT urography. Abdom. Radiol. 2019;44:3811–3826. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-02108-x
- Metser U, Goldstein MA, Chawla TP, et al. Detection of urothelial tumors: Comparison of urothelial phase with excretory phase CT urography — a prospective study. Radiology. 2012;264(1):110–118. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12111623
- Kim JK, Park SY, Ahn HJ, Kim CS, Cho KS. Bladder cancer: analysis of multi-detector row helical CT enhancement pattern and accuracy in tumor detection and perivesical staging. Radiology. 2004;231(3):725–731. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2313021253
- Saksena MA, Dahl DM, Harisinghani MG. New imaging modalities in bladder cancer. World J Urol. 2006;24(5):473–480. doi: 10.1007/s00345-006-0118-7
- Parakh A, Lennartz S, An C, et al. Dual-Energy CT Images: Pearls and Pitfalls. Radiographics. 2021;41(1):98–119. doi: 10.1148/rg.2021200102
- Sauter A, Muenzel D, Dangelmaier J, et al. Dual-Layer Spectral Computed Tomography: Virtual Non-Contrast in Comparison to True Non-Contrast Images. Eur J Radiol. 2018;104:108–114. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.05.007
- Ananthakrishnan L, Rajiah P, Ahn R, et al. Spectral Detector CT-Derived Virtual Non-Contrast Images: Comparison of Attenuation Values with Unenhanced CT. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017;42(3):702–709. doi: 10.1007/s00261-016-1036-9
- Fornaro J, Leschka S, Hibbeln D, et al. Dual- and multi-energy CT: approach to functional imaging. Insights Imaging. 2011;2(2):149–159. doi: 10.1007/s13244-010-0057-0
- Silva AC, Morse BG, Hara AK, et al. Dual-energy (spectral) CT: applications in abdominal imaging. Radiographics. 2011;31(4):1031–1050. doi: 10.1148/rg.314105159
- Salameh JP, McInnes MDF, McGrath TA, Salameh G, Schieda N. Diagnostic Accuracy of Dual-Energy CT for Evaluation of Renal Masses: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019;212(4):W100–W105. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20527
- Ascenti G, Mazziotti S, Mileto A, et al. Dual-source dual-energy CT evaluation of complex cystic renal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199(5):1026–1034. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.7711
- Mileto A, Nelson RC, Samei E, et al. Impact of dual-energy multi-detector row CT with virtual monochromatic imaging on renal cyst pseudoenhancement: in vitro and in vivo study. Radiology. 2014;272(3):767–776. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14132856
- Chandarana H, Megibow AJ, Cohen BA, et al. Iodine quantification with dual-energy CT: phantom study and preliminary experience with renal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196(6):W693–W700. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5541
- Tatsugami F, Higaki T, Nakamura Y, Honda Y, Awai K. Dual-energy CT: minimal essentials for radiologists. Jpn J Radiol. 2022;40(6):547–559. doi: 10.1007/s11604-021-01233-2
- Nolte-Ernsting C, Cowan N. Understanding multislice CT urography techniques: Many roads lead to Rome. Eur Radiol. 2006;16(12):2670–2686. doi: 10.1007/s00330-006-0386-z
- Ge X, Lan ZK, Chen J, Zhu SY. Effectiveness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for detecting the staging and grading of bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Ultrason. 2021;23(1):29–35. doi: 10.11152/mu-2730
- Takahashi N, Vrtiska TJ, Kawashima A, et al. Detectability of urinary stones on virtual nonenhanced images generated at pyelographic-phase dual-energy CT. Radiology. 2010;256(1):184–190. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091411
- Mangold S, Thomas C, Fenchel M, et al. Virtual nonenhanced dual-energy CT urography with tin-filter technology: determinants of detection of urinary calculi in the renal collecting system. Radiology. 2012;264(1):119–125. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12110851
- Coursey CA, Nelson RC, Boll DT, et al. Dual-energy multidetector CT: how does it work, what can it tell us, and when can we use it in abdominopelvic imaging? Radiographics. 2010;30(4):1037–1055. doi: 10.1148/rg.304095175
- Graser A, Johnson TR, Hecht EM, et al. Dual-energy CT in patients suspected of having renal masses: can virtual nonenhanced images replace true nonenhanced images? Radiology. 2009;252(2):433–440. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2522080557
- Nakagawa M, Naiki T, Naiki-Ito A, et al. Usefulness of advanced monoenergetic reconstruction technique in dual-energy computed tomography for detecting bladder cancer. Jpn J Radiol. 2022;40(2):177–183. doi: 10.1007/s11604-021-01195-5
- Patel BN, Vernuccio F, Meyer M, et al. Dual-Energy CT Material Density Iodine Quantification for Distinguishing Vascular From Nonvascular Renal Lesions: Normalization Reduces Intermanufacturer Threshold Variability. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019;212(2):366–376. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20115
- De Cecco CN, Darnell A, Rengo M, et al. Dual-energy CT: oncologic applications. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199(5S):S98–S105. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9207
- Vrtiska TJ, Takahashi N, Fletcher JG, et al. Genitourinary applications of dual-energy CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(6):1434–1442. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4404
- Montatore M, Muscatella G, Eusebi L, et al. Current status on new technique and protocol in urinary stone disease. Current Radiology Reports. 2023;11:161–176. doi: 10.1007/s40134-023-00420-5
Supplementary files
















